July 6, 2023

MM#249--Philosophy 101--Aquinas, part 2

FAN MAIL--We would love YOUR feedback--Send us a Text Message Are you ready to unlock the labyrinthine logic of one of history's greatest thinkers? This episode draws back the curtain on the monumental body of work by St Thomas Aquinas, in part 2 with the astute guidance of Professor Peter Krief, in his series " Socrates Children." If you missed the other episodes of Philosophy 101 be sure to check out below for easy access and replay. We reveal the unique approach needed to tackle ...

Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconCastro podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconCastro podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon

FAN MAIL--We would love YOUR feedback--Send us a Text Message

Are you ready to unlock the labyrinthine logic of one of history's greatest thinkers?

This episode draws back the curtain on the monumental body of work by St Thomas Aquinas, in part 2 with the astute guidance of Professor Peter Krief, in his series "  Socrates Children."

If you missed the other episodes of Philosophy 101 be sure to check out below for easy access and replay.

We reveal the unique approach needed to tackle Aquinas' opus, the Summa Theologia, a work that demands careful, methodical study. 

Key Points from the Episode:

  • We tread the path of his relentless pursuit of truth, and the intricate architecture of his arguments. 
  • Strap in as we up the ante in the second half, dissecting Aquinas' compelling five proofs of God's existence. 
  • We delve headfirst into the tangible world of observation, movement and degrees of perfection, and how Aquinas weaves these threads into the fabric of his argument for a divine being. 
  • We grapple with his paradoxical stance on the existence of evil and his insistence on tracing all mutable phenomena back to an unchangeable source. 
  • This conversation promises a rich understanding of Aquinas' philosophy and the powerful legacy he left behind. Tune in for a thought-provoking journey into the heart of this extraordinary philosopher's work.

Other resources:

Philosophy 101--Aristotle

Philosophy 101--Plato

Philosophy 101--Socrates

Philosophy 101--Augustine

Philosophy 101--Aquinas, part 1


More goodness
Get our top book recommendations list

Want to leave a review? Click here, and if we earned a five-star review from you **high five and knuckle bumps**, we appreciate it greatly, thank you so much!

Because we care what you think about what we think and our website, please email David@teammojoacademy.com, or if you want to leave us a quick FREE, painless voicemail, we would appreciate that as well.

02:56 - how to read St Thomas & God's circulatory system

07:57 - introduction to the five proofs of God

11:11 - the famous five proofs

19:07 - closing--why St. Thomas is so great

WEBVTT

00:00:07.608 --> 00:00:20.806
Welcome to the Theory to Action podcast, where we examine the timeless treasures of wisdom from the great books in less time, to help you take action immediately and ultimately to create and lead a flourishing life.

00:00:20.806 --> 00:00:24.847
Now here's your host, David Kaiser.

00:00:26.519 --> 00:00:36.689
Hello, i am David and welcome back to another Mojo Minute And welcome back to our continuing series of Philosophy 101.

00:00:36.689 --> 00:00:38.384
Thank you very much for joining us.

00:00:38.384 --> 00:00:50.685
As I keep saying, we are going to take a deep dive in the deep end of the pool in Philosophy 101, our little mini course we have going on here And most people are enjoying it.

00:00:50.685 --> 00:00:59.929
Now, our guide and mentor for this mini course if you've been following along with us in Philosophy 101 is the professor Peter Krief.

00:00:59.929 --> 00:01:01.784
And who is Peter Krief?

00:01:01.784 --> 00:01:15.953
Well, he wrote a great four volume series of books called Socrates Children, which offer us a roadmap, a very simple roadmap, for understanding this wonderful philosophical deep dive.

00:01:15.953 --> 00:01:27.287
In the beginning of this four volumes, peter Krief tells us in fact he reminds us that we only need to know nine big philosophers in all of human history.

00:01:27.287 --> 00:01:28.230
Why?

00:01:28.230 --> 00:01:31.808
Because they represent the big ideas that we are confronted with on a daily basis.

00:01:31.808 --> 00:01:45.790
The others you know, the other 91, i guess, if my math is good, public school education there The other 91, they are just filling in the gaps of the big nine.

00:01:45.790 --> 00:01:49.204
So that should give us some reassurance.

00:01:49.204 --> 00:01:54.084
If we don't like reading Philosophy, we can just read the big nine philosophers.

00:01:54.084 --> 00:01:55.688
And who are these big nine.

00:01:55.688 --> 00:02:05.867
They are again real quick Socrates, plato, aristotle, augustine, aquinas, descartes, hume, kant and Hegel.

00:02:05.867 --> 00:02:19.991
And keeping up our tradition of putting the previous Philosophy 101 episodes in the show notes We want never to do that again So you can catch up if you missed any and re-listen to them again, if possible.

00:02:21.080 --> 00:02:27.043
Now, with all that administrative stuff out of the way, let's dive into St Thomas Aquinas, part two.

00:02:27.043 --> 00:02:34.865
And if you listen to part one, you know that St Thomas Aquinas is one of the greatest in all of human history.

00:02:34.865 --> 00:02:42.271
He was born in 1225, lived all the way till 1274.

00:02:42.271 --> 00:02:49.182
And again, our book that we're pulling these quotes from is Socrates' Children by Professor Peter Krief.

00:02:49.182 --> 00:02:54.854
And with that let's roll to our first poll quote on this great saint and philosopher.

00:02:54.854 --> 00:03:01.810
End of the book Aquinas' writings and how to read them.

00:03:03.293 --> 00:03:18.951
In his short 25-year career he wrote tens of thousands of pages, over 8 million words, including 2 million commenting on the Bible and 1 million on Aristotle alone, in addition to his unfinished masterpiece, the Summa Theologia.

00:03:18.951 --> 00:03:37.145
The Summa is not a closed system but an ordered summary, a mirror of reality, beginning in God, proceeding to creation, centering on man, culminating in man's search for happiness and return to God, who is the Alpha and the Omega.

00:03:37.145 --> 00:04:00.092
Reality is seen as a kind of cosmic circulatory system, with the heart of God pumping the blood of being through the arteries of creation into the universe, which wears a human face, and receiving the cosmos back through the veins of man's reason and free choice of moral virtue, faith, hope and love.

00:04:00.092 --> 00:04:16.088
Is that not a fascinating picture, fantastically beautiful, if we think of God's whole creation as a what did Creef call it?

00:04:16.088 --> 00:04:35.101
a kind of cosmic circulatory system, with the heart of God pumping the blood of being through the arteries of creation in the universe And we, in the human face, we receive that grace and then we give it back in free choice of a moral virtue, faith, hope and love.

00:04:35.101 --> 00:04:42.634
Just fantastic writing and impeccable analogy by Peter Creef.

00:04:42.634 --> 00:04:45.925
Very, very good stuff, in fact.

00:04:45.925 --> 00:04:47.771
I'm sure we'll come back to it again and again.

00:04:47.771 --> 00:04:52.446
That same picture, that same analogy, the cosmic circulatory system.

00:04:55.471 --> 00:05:04.440
Even if you're not a theologian, a Catholic, a Christian or a theist, your mind will be powerfully exercised and improved by reading Aquinas.

00:05:04.440 --> 00:05:05.644
Read him slowly.

00:05:05.644 --> 00:05:09.310
It is more like reading Euclid than reading Dickens.

00:05:09.310 --> 00:05:12.425
Now, total aside, we will cut.

00:05:12.425 --> 00:05:14.432
We will read Euclid later on.

00:05:14.432 --> 00:05:20.689
He's in the pipeline, because how did our 16th president of the United States, abraham Lincoln.

00:05:20.689 --> 00:05:23.781
How did he teach himself to argue law?

00:05:23.781 --> 00:05:27.266
He read, of all people, euclid.

00:05:27.266 --> 00:05:42.927
About mathematics, straightforward arguments, and that is how, in many biographies, over and over, i have read where Lincoln, reading Euclid, gave him clarity of writing and thinking.

00:05:42.927 --> 00:05:44.591
Very fascinating stuff.

00:05:44.591 --> 00:05:50.567
Going back to the book about Aquinas, Read him slowly.

00:05:50.567 --> 00:05:53.814
It's more like reading Euclid than reading Dickens.

00:05:53.814 --> 00:05:55.642
It is like eating spinach.

00:05:55.642 --> 00:05:58.689
It may taste strange at first but it makes you strong.

00:05:58.689 --> 00:06:03.511
His habits of clarity, order and logic rub off even when you disagree with him.

00:06:03.511 --> 00:06:10.930
He is always scrupulously fair, though his style is utter, utterly prosaic.

00:06:10.930 --> 00:06:16.406
Compared to Augustine's, his fanatical honesty and passion for the truth is similar.

00:06:16.406 --> 00:06:19.860
Very important point on Aquinas passion for the truth.

00:06:19.860 --> 00:06:31.391
A CIA agent recruiting for spies among philosophers would find no two more hopelessly inept liars than these two, meaning Augustine and Aquinas.

00:06:32.053 --> 00:06:37.793
The basic unit of the summa is the article, which is a very abbreviated summary of a debate.

00:06:37.793 --> 00:06:46.322
It is typically one to three pages long and it contains five parts, all of which are necessary for a complete logical treatment.

00:06:46.322 --> 00:06:51.512
Number one the question is formulated in a yes or no pro con format.

00:06:51.512 --> 00:06:54.723
Quote weather, dot, dot, dot.

00:06:54.723 --> 00:07:04.632
Number two all the major objections to Aquinas's answer are stated as clearly and strongly and fairly as possible.

00:07:04.632 --> 00:07:12.872
Quote it seems that dot dot, dot, number three, the argument from a past authority for Aquinas's answer, is given.

00:07:12.872 --> 00:07:17.331
Quote on the contrary, dot dot, dot, number four.

00:07:17.331 --> 00:07:26.254
The main body of the article then defines terms, explains presumptions and proves its conclusions with syllogisms.

00:07:26.254 --> 00:07:32.168
Quote I answer that dot, dot, dot, number five.

00:07:32.168 --> 00:07:42.009
Each objection is answered usually by distinguishing two meanings of ambiguous terms, thus perceiving half half truths.

00:07:42.009 --> 00:07:47.245
In each objection, quote, i respond dot dot, dot.

00:07:47.625 --> 00:08:04.240
Like this Socratic Dialogue, it is an imminently immeantable can't say that word immit, tatable, imitatable format, and that is the power of St Thomas Aquinas.

00:08:04.240 --> 00:08:05.624
His writing is very clear.

00:08:05.624 --> 00:08:19.266
If my pronunciation isn't so clear, aquinas's writing is very ordered and indeed the logic does rub off as you read it, and I just love those five parts of each of the articles.

00:08:19.266 --> 00:08:32.923
Now, speaking of five, the most famous of St Thomas Aquinas is five is the notion that he proved the existence of God through reason, and his most famous of all arguments the five ways in the Summa Theologiae.

00:08:32.923 --> 00:08:39.224
We have some heavy sledding in front of us, so to speak.

00:08:39.224 --> 00:08:46.184
Let's begin to hammer away, and we have some long quotes, but I thought it is well worth it.

00:08:48.110 --> 00:08:57.597
The most famous of all arguments for the existence of God are Aquinas's five ways in the Summa Theologiae One, two and three.

00:08:57.597 --> 00:09:10.684
They are abbreviated summaries of longer, more complex arguments, ie the first way takes only one paragraph in the Summa Theologiae, but 21 paragraphs in the Summa Contra Gentiles.

00:09:10.684 --> 00:09:13.191
They're common strategies.

00:09:13.191 --> 00:09:39.701
To begin with an empirical observation of some feature of the world, ie motion, change coming into being, contingency, the possibility to not exist or to go out of existence, degrees of perfection, in order Then use the principle of causality to prove that these empirical phenomena are not inexplicable, explainable, sorry, not explicable.

00:09:39.701 --> 00:09:52.240
To prove that these empirical phenomena are not explainable unless there is a first and uncaused cause, which is one of the unique properties of God.

00:09:52.240 --> 00:10:04.625
The five proofs correspond to five kinds of causality cause of motion, change, cause of existence, cause of necessity, cause of degrees of perfection or goodness and cause of order.

00:10:04.625 --> 00:10:08.317
Tell logical order to an end And each.

00:10:08.879 --> 00:10:24.642
The essential argument is that if there is no first uncaused cause, there could be no second caused causes, no matter how many these may be, but there are second causes.

00:10:24.642 --> 00:10:27.150
Therefore there must be a first cause.

00:10:27.150 --> 00:10:31.445
Thus we conclude to a being with five divine attributes.

00:10:31.445 --> 00:10:34.452
Number one unmoved mover.

00:10:34.452 --> 00:10:37.802
Number two uncaused cause of existence.

00:10:37.802 --> 00:10:43.577
Number three necessarily and eternally existent.

00:10:43.577 --> 00:10:46.688
Number four absolutely perfect standard of perfection.

00:10:46.688 --> 00:10:52.004
And number five intelligent cause of order to an end.

00:10:52.004 --> 00:10:56.753
Whoa, wrap your mind around that.

00:10:56.753 --> 00:10:59.004
It was just hard enough to read it, let alone think about it.

00:10:59.004 --> 00:11:04.465
But very, very good stuff, certainly very close to the truth.

00:11:05.008 --> 00:11:14.606
Now let's quote the famous argument verbatim from Aquinas, whether God exists.

00:11:14.606 --> 00:11:25.650
Objection 1, it seems that God does not exist because if one of the two Contraries be infinite, the other would be altogether destroyed.

00:11:25.650 --> 00:11:29.688
But the word God means that he is infinite goodness.

00:11:29.688 --> 00:11:37.327
If, therefore, god existed, there would be no evil discoverable, but there is evil in the world.

00:11:37.327 --> 00:11:38.831
Therefore, god does not exist.

00:11:38.831 --> 00:11:53.929
Objection number two Further, it is Superfluous to suppose that what can be accounted for by a few principles have been produced by many, but it seems that everything we see in the world can be accounted for by other principles.

00:11:53.929 --> 00:12:07.173
Supposing God did not exist, for all natural things can be reduced to one principle the source, which is nature, and all voluntary things can be reduced to one principle, which is human reason or will.

00:12:07.173 --> 00:12:11.591
Therefore, there is no need to suppose God's existence.

00:12:11.591 --> 00:12:15.883
On the contrary, note that phrase.

00:12:15.883 --> 00:12:23.605
On the contrary, it is said in the person of God I am, who am Exodus 314,.

00:12:23.605 --> 00:12:27.143
I answer that Again.

00:12:27.143 --> 00:12:30.157
Note that I answer that phrase.

00:12:30.157 --> 00:12:34.331
I answer that The existence of God can be proved in five ways.

00:12:35.601 --> 00:12:40.039
The first and more manifest way is the argument for motion change, any change.

00:12:40.039 --> 00:12:44.631
It is certain and evident to our senses that in the world, some things are in motion.

00:12:44.631 --> 00:13:03.625
Now, whatever is in motion is put in motion by another, for nothing can be in motion except in its potentiality to, to that towards which is in motion, whereas a thing moves in as much as it is, in act, the actuality of it.

00:13:03.625 --> 00:13:14.695
Thus, that which is actually hot, such as fire, makes wood, which is potentially hot, to be actually hot and thereby moves and changes it.

00:13:14.695 --> 00:13:29.580
Now, it is not possible that the same thing should be at once in actuality and potentiality, in the same respect, but only in different respects, for what is actually hot cannot simultaneously be potentially hot but it is potentially cold.

00:13:29.580 --> 00:13:41.799
It is therefore impossible that in the same respect, in the same way, anything should be both mover and moved, that it should not move itself.

00:13:41.799 --> 00:13:49.200
Therefore, whatever is in motion must be put in motion by another.

00:13:49.200 --> 00:14:02.716
Stay with me If that by which is in motion be itself put in motion, then this also must needs be put in motion by another, and that by another again.

00:14:02.716 --> 00:14:23.256
But this cannot go on, ie regress to infinity, because then there would be no first mover and consequently no other mover, seeing that subsequent movers move only in his motion, as they are put in motion by the first mover, as the staff moves only because it is put in motion by the hand.

00:14:23.256 --> 00:14:38.527
Therefore, it is necessary to arrive at a first mover put in motion by no other, and this everyone understands to be God, right on right on Good stuff.

00:14:38.527 --> 00:14:39.432
right there It's moving.

00:14:41.462 --> 00:14:42.846
Let's move on to the second way.

00:14:42.846 --> 00:14:48.423
We're not going to cover all five ways, but the second way is a compelling proof of God as well.

00:14:48.423 --> 00:14:51.735
Actually, all five are compelling proofs of God.

00:14:51.735 --> 00:15:06.174
We just don't have the time to cover all five in complete depth, so we're going to cover number three or, i'm sorry, number two, and let's go back to the book to cover number two.

00:15:06.174 --> 00:15:11.945
The second proof for the reason of, for the reason of God to exist.

00:15:14.289 --> 00:15:17.197
The second way is from the nature of the efficient cause.

00:15:17.197 --> 00:15:21.788
In the world of sense we find there is an order of efficient causes.

00:15:21.788 --> 00:15:24.215
There is no case known.

00:15:24.215 --> 00:15:37.486
Neither is it indeed possible in which a thing is to be found, is found to be the efficient cause of itself, for it so would be prior to itself, which is impossible.

00:15:37.486 --> 00:15:55.590
Now, in efficient causes, it is not possible to go on to infinity because in all efficient causes, following an order, the first is the cause of the intermediate cause and the intermediate cause is the cause of the ultimate cause, whether the intermediate cause be several or one.

00:15:55.590 --> 00:15:59.461
Only Now, to take away the cause is to take away the effect.

00:15:59.461 --> 00:16:10.466
Therefore, if there be no first cause among efficient causes, there will be no ultimate, nor any immediate cause.

00:16:10.466 --> 00:16:17.996
But if an efficient cause is, it is possible to go on to infinity.

00:16:17.996 --> 00:16:22.548
There will be no efficient cause, follow me.

00:16:22.548 --> 00:16:31.346
Neither will there be an ultimate effect, nor any intermediate effect causes, all of which is plainly false.

00:16:31.346 --> 00:16:40.028
Therefore, it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everything gives the name of God.

00:16:40.028 --> 00:16:49.686
Oh yeah, so some very deep, heavy, philosophical language there.

00:16:49.686 --> 00:16:51.168
Wrap your minds around.

00:16:51.168 --> 00:16:59.246
One last quote, i promise we're going to skip three, proof three and proof four.

00:16:59.246 --> 00:17:02.754
We're going to hit proof five and then we will wrap up.

00:17:03.014 --> 00:17:04.258
St Thomas Aquinas, part two.

00:17:04.258 --> 00:17:27.887
The fifth way is taken from the governance governance of the world We see that things which lack intelligence, such as natural bodies, act for an end, and this is evident from their acting always and nearly always, from their acting always, or nearly always, in the same way, so as to obtain the best result.

00:17:27.887 --> 00:17:35.865
Hence it is plain that not fortuitously but designedly do they achieve their end.

00:17:35.865 --> 00:17:58.365
Now, whatever lacks intelligence cannot move towards an end unless it be directed by some being with knowledge and intelligence, as the arrow is shot to its mark by the archer, therefore, some intelligent being exists, by whom all things are directed to their end In this being we call God.

00:17:58.365 --> 00:18:16.230
Now the reply to Objection One is, as Augustine says, since God is the highest good, he would not allow any evil to exist in his works unless his omnipotence and goodness were such to bring good even out of evil.

00:18:16.230 --> 00:18:22.951
This is part of the infinite goodness of God that he should allow evil to exist and out of it produce good.

00:18:24.413 --> 00:18:36.577
And the reply to Objection Number Two is, since nature works for a determinant and under the direction of a higher agent, whatever is done by nature must be traced back to God as its first cause.

00:18:36.577 --> 00:19:04.565
So also, whatever is done voluntarily must also be traced back to some higher cause other than human reason and will, since these can change and fail, for all things that are changeable and capable of defect must be traced back to an immovable and self-necessary first principle, as was shown in the body of the article.

00:19:04.565 --> 00:19:10.673
All right, coming up for air.

00:19:10.673 --> 00:19:20.773
I know that's deep and profound, very difficult to listen to just in a simple podcast, but I think that was all very, very good.

00:19:20.773 --> 00:19:22.806
Thank you for hanging with me Now.

00:19:22.806 --> 00:19:31.294
St Thomas Aquinas was writing all that in the 13th century, essentially proving in five ways the existence of God through human reason.

00:19:31.294 --> 00:19:41.278
Now we could spend another 100 episodes on St Thomas Aquinas, but I think you can get a feel for him now and why he is so great, so pivotal.

00:19:41.278 --> 00:19:52.673
So in this Mojo Minute, let's use Peter Creef's own closing on his section on St Thomas Aquinas to end this Mojo Minute.

00:19:54.699 --> 00:19:59.488
Aquinas, as a Christian, knew that merely natural, rational virtue is incomplete.

00:19:59.914 --> 00:20:14.724
Reason alone can tell us, as it told pagans like Plato and Aristotle, that our supreme happiness lies in union with God, and it can show us our natural desire for God, but it cannot tell us how to attain this desire.

00:20:14.724 --> 00:20:33.556
Only God's supernatural grace and love revealed in history the incarnation Jesus Christ in person, god made man in person and accepted by faith, can meet and fulfill our deepest natural longing, bottom line.

00:20:33.556 --> 00:20:38.646
Without Christ, we are doomed to ultimate pessimism and frustration.

00:20:38.646 --> 00:20:50.538
Ultimately, aquinas' ethics is a detailing or an unpackaging or completion of Augustine's restless heart.

00:20:50.538 --> 00:20:57.979
Remember from our previous mojo minute our hearts are restless until they rest in you, is what Augustine said.

00:20:57.979 --> 00:21:02.182
Therefore, aquinas synthesizes.

00:21:02.182 --> 00:21:06.163
He synthesizes not only Augustine and Aristotle.

00:21:06.163 --> 00:21:22.303
He synthesizes theology and philosophy, the Bible and the Greeks, the soul and the body, reason and senses, intellect and will, faith and reason, natural and supernatural, but even God and man in Christ.

00:21:22.303 --> 00:21:39.021
His philosophy is the ultimate both and instead of either or, and that is probably the greatest compliment you could ever say of Thomas Aquinas.

00:21:47.315 --> 00:21:48.338
Thank you for joining us.

00:21:48.338 --> 00:21:51.743
We hope you enjoyed this Theory to Action podcast.

00:21:51.743 --> 00:22:00.903
Be sure to check out our show page at teammojoacademycom, where we have everything we discussed in this podcast, as well as other great resources.

00:22:00.903 --> 00:22:04.696
Until next time, keep getting your mojo on.