WEBVTT
00:00:07.608 --> 00:00:20.806
Welcome to the Theory to Action podcast, where we examine the timeless treasures of wisdom from the great books in less time, to help you take action immediately and ultimately to create and lead a flourishing life.
00:00:20.806 --> 00:00:24.849
Now here's your host, david Kaiser.
00:00:25.620 --> 00:00:36.606
Hello, I am David and welcome back to another Mojo Minute and to this ongoing trilogy series, which is all about American foreign policy.
00:00:36.606 --> 00:00:49.524
Now, part one was on Tuesday, where we checked out the Four Ages of American Foreign Policy by Michael Mandembaum, so be sure to check out that episode.
00:00:49.524 --> 00:01:10.938
And today is part two of our three part series, and what this series is covering is we're posing to ourselves what are some of the best books in which to read so you can have a better understanding of American foreign policy, and especially what we have learned, let's say, in the last 25 years.
00:01:10.938 --> 00:01:13.346
Have we learned anything as a country?
00:01:13.346 --> 00:01:16.787
And we will try to answer that question.
00:01:16.787 --> 00:01:49.287
In addition to that, we're going to be researching and diving deep into the best books about our topic at hand and we're going to be asking ourselves the difficult questions, the difficult questions in this trilogy, because tough questions when pondering them, when meditating on them, when praying about them, helps us to have a fuller understanding of the problems and the dynamics all associated with American foreign policy.
00:01:49.287 --> 00:02:08.687
In fact, no matter that topic at hand, good, tough questions and their answers help all of us understand better and move us towards discovery of the truth, albeit in a faster and more, better fashion.
00:02:10.460 --> 00:02:20.924
And speaking of tough questions, last time, in our last episode, we introduced three of the tough questions we hope to answer, so let's bring them up again.
00:02:20.924 --> 00:02:25.407
Number one, and these are all about foreign policy.
00:02:25.407 --> 00:02:47.408
So, number one can we rightfully label the founding fathers as proponents of isolationism when we compare the founders' visions and ideals of American foreign policy to how we should conduct our foreign policy in the 21st century?
00:02:47.408 --> 00:02:48.610
Why or why not?
00:02:48.610 --> 00:02:59.831
Number two do international organizations such as the United Nations and the League of Nations align with the founders' perceptions of foreign policy?
00:02:59.831 --> 00:03:10.347
And number three how could the US, meddling in the politics of another country, infringe upon the rights of its own American citizens?
00:03:10.347 --> 00:03:23.550
And where I'm going with this question is what insights might the founding fathers provide on America's engagement in Ukraine, halfway around the world?
00:03:23.550 --> 00:03:28.554
Now, we will try to answer those questions before the end of this episode.
00:03:28.675 --> 00:03:35.312
But speaking of Ukraine, let's pivot to our book of the day, which is a fantastic one.
00:03:35.312 --> 00:03:53.890
It's title is the Russo-Ukrainian War the Return of History by Sergei Polkiy, and instead of our usual format of covering our books, we're going to switch it up and do a Q&A format, question and answer format to hopefully make it a little bit more appealing to you.
00:03:53.890 --> 00:03:54.412
We'll see.
00:03:54.412 --> 00:04:12.953
We'll try to switch it up, give you something different as a listener, and we searched and browsed the internet to come up with our top 10 questions, along with what we thought the standard answers that people were commonly coming up with.
00:04:12.953 --> 00:04:18.432
We did this throughout Google, and it's all about the Russo-Ukrainian War.
00:04:18.432 --> 00:04:32.714
So we got 10 questions here and we're going to dig into those, but we'll also pull some answers as a different take from the Sergei Polkiy book that we're covering today.
00:04:32.714 --> 00:04:39.101
So you'll see how this all works once we get to our first question, which we're going to do now.
00:04:40.199 --> 00:04:44.468
Number one what are the origins of the Russo-Ukrainian War?
00:04:44.468 --> 00:04:51.860
The common answer is, from what we can gather, is the use.
00:04:51.860 --> 00:05:00.182
The Russo-Ukrainian war originated from a complex mix of historical tensions, political ambitions and cultural differences.
00:05:00.182 --> 00:05:26.194
The refusal of Ukraine's former president, viktor Yukanovich and I'll crucify all these Russian names or Ukrainian names Viktor Yukanovich to sign an association agreement with the European Union triggered the protest which led to his ousting and to Russia's subsequent annexation of Crimea.
00:05:26.194 --> 00:05:30.485
That is what most people believe, that all happened in 2014.
00:05:30.485 --> 00:05:38.649
Now, in reading Sergey Polke's book, you get a different sense of the origins of this war.
00:05:38.649 --> 00:05:39.630
Let's go to that book.
00:05:42.199 --> 00:05:53.591
The roots of the current war are to be found in the history of imperial collapse in the 19th and 20th centuries, which also produced the key ideas that fueled the current conflict.
00:05:53.591 --> 00:05:58.843
My basic argument is that what we see today is not an entirely new phenomenon.
00:05:58.843 --> 00:06:16.175
In many ways, the current conflict is an old fashioned imperial war conducted by Russian elites who see themselves as errors and continuators of the great power expansionist traditions of the Russian Empire in the Soviet Union.
00:06:16.175 --> 00:06:33.951
On Ukraine's part, it is, first and foremost, a war of independence, a desperate attempt on behalf of a new nation that emerged from the ruins of the Soviet collapse to defend its right to existence Despite its imperial roots.
00:06:33.951 --> 00:06:54.091
The current war is being waged in a new international environment, defined by the proliferation of nuclear weapons, the disintegration of the post-Cold War international order and an unprecedented resurgence of populist nationalism, last seen in the 1930s, throughout the world.
00:06:54.091 --> 00:07:10.999
The war clearly indicates that Europe and the world have all but spent the peace dividend resulting from the collapse of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and are entering a new and yet as yet undetermined era.
00:07:10.999 --> 00:07:21.961
A new world order, possibly replicating the bipolar world of the Cold War era, is being forged in the flames of the current war.
00:07:21.961 --> 00:07:27.055
So that is some pretty good analysis there by Sergey Polkiy.
00:07:27.677 --> 00:07:30.682
Now, who is Sergey Polkiy?
00:07:30.682 --> 00:07:46.375
Well, he's Ukrainian born, so he does have a dog in this fight, but he is a very objective and he's wonderfully readable.
00:07:46.375 --> 00:08:16.166
This is a very complex and nuanced war with a lot of tentacles that stretch back decades, if not tens of decades, centuries, in fact, all the way back to Ivan the Terrible and Catherine the Great, with which Putin seems to be leaning towards more as his motivators as he reads more and more Russian imperial history.
00:08:16.166 --> 00:08:21.137
But Sergey Polkiy is a Ukrainian born historian.
00:08:21.137 --> 00:08:25.103
He lost a cousin in this war.
00:08:25.103 --> 00:08:28.851
So far Now, this book was only written.
00:08:28.851 --> 00:08:30.154
It was.
00:08:30.154 --> 00:08:34.385
The war started on in February of 2022.
00:08:34.385 --> 00:08:37.452
This is finished in March of 2023.
00:08:37.452 --> 00:08:44.712
So it covers roughly about 10 to 11 months by the time the publisher got the book to market.
00:08:44.712 --> 00:08:51.628
But he is a great chronicler of early and modern Ukraine.
00:08:51.628 --> 00:09:16.716
He has other books the Gates of Europe that I want to read, lost Kingdom, the man with a Poison Gun and Chernobyl, which Chernobyl won the 2018 Bolly Gifford Prize, and that book is all about the 1986 nuclear disaster.
00:09:16.716 --> 00:09:21.748
So Polkiy is a very good historian.
00:09:21.748 --> 00:09:23.673
I didn't sense anything.
00:09:23.673 --> 00:09:41.772
That was totally out of bounds, and after getting drenched for the last year and a half to two years all about Russia, with Russian propaganda, I wanted to find a very good historian from the Ukrainian side to see what they had to say, and that's where I found this book.
00:09:41.772 --> 00:09:49.610
So a very good, very good, readable book, and I think it just gives another side of the story.
00:09:50.533 --> 00:09:58.153
Moving on to our second question, why did Russia invade Crimea in 2014?
00:09:58.153 --> 00:10:03.409
Russia invaded Crimea under the pretext of protecting the Russian speaking population there.
00:10:03.409 --> 00:10:19.572
However, underlying reasons include strategic military interest, as in the Crimea houses, the Russia's Black Sea Fleet, and political objectives to reassert influence over former Soviet territories.
00:10:19.572 --> 00:10:21.836
That's the general consensus.
00:10:21.836 --> 00:10:25.951
Now, what does Polkiy say about this invasion of Crimea?
00:10:25.951 --> 00:10:28.076
Let's go to chapter five of his book.
00:10:30.924 --> 00:10:47.493
The Crimea, the only part of Ukraine in which ethnic Russians constituted a majority of the population and a bone of contention between Russian and Ukraine since the late Soviet years, had long been a Kremlin integrationist horizon.
00:10:47.493 --> 00:10:54.649
Back in 1994, boris Yeltsin had decided not to intervene in Ukraine's internal affairs.
00:10:54.649 --> 00:11:06.462
When Ukrainian voters elected the allegedly pro-Russian president, leon Kuchma, and Ukrainian politicians negotiated their relations with the Crimean elites.
00:11:06.462 --> 00:11:28.721
Now Putin, faced with the loss of his protege in Kiev, ukraine's almost certain signing of an association agreement with the EU, and thus the fiasco of his plans to involve Ukraine and the Russian-led Customs Union and Eurasian Union decided to take the peninsula by force.
00:11:28.721 --> 00:11:38.874
There was no separatist movement in sight, as had been the case in 1994, but there were other factors that Putin sought to use to his advantage.
00:11:38.874 --> 00:12:08.993
They included the interregnum in Kiev, the questionable legitimacy of parliament's removal of Yanukovych from power in the no less questionable credentials of his successor, and the inability of new authorities to gain the trust of the Ukrainian secret services, which they had fought with Molotov cocktails only a few days before, if not hours earlier.
00:12:08.993 --> 00:12:29.658
Soon, the Ukrainian parliament gave Putin a political gift with its maledroit adoption of a new law supporting the use of the Ukrainian language, which pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine characterize as an attack on Russian minority rights.
00:12:29.658 --> 00:12:40.047
The Kremlin exploited the law to stoke the flames of Russian nationalism and separatism, thereby helping to justify the annexation.
00:12:40.047 --> 00:12:47.441
Very interesting Never heard of that from the Western press.
00:12:50.027 --> 00:12:56.903
Now our third question what is the current status of the Russia-Russo-Ukrainian war Now?
00:12:56.903 --> 00:13:01.774
As of now, in September 2023, the Russo-Ukrainian war is still ongoing.
00:13:01.774 --> 00:13:11.823
The Russian army made significant gains in the first year, but lost them towards the end of the year, the end of 2022.
00:13:11.823 --> 00:13:26.644
Now the fighting is now grinding into a halt, almost somewhat of a stalemate now, and many believe the US-backed sophisticated weaponry has pushed the Ukrainians over the top into believing they can win.
00:13:26.644 --> 00:13:40.866
Now the eastern and southern portions of Ukraine is where most of the fighting is taking place, as Ukraine is on the move with its own counteroffensive as we speak Now.
00:13:40.866 --> 00:14:00.683
Like I said, sergei's book only covers the first 10 months of this war, so it would be out of date to quote from it now about anything regarding the war, or only to say that he describes some horrific scenes of what the Russians had done on their first year in country.
00:14:00.683 --> 00:14:05.438
So if you are interested in that, by all means get this book.
00:14:05.438 --> 00:14:06.883
I would highly recommend it.
00:14:08.407 --> 00:14:16.495
And then, moving on to our fourth question of 10, how has the international community responded to the Russo-Ukrainian war?
00:14:16.495 --> 00:14:26.681
Most outlets come down somewhere along the lines of this the international community has largely condemned Russia's actions.
00:14:26.681 --> 00:14:32.530
Sanctions have been imposed by the US, the EU and other western countries.
00:14:32.530 --> 00:14:47.366
However, russia has received support from a few nations, most especially China, which is furthering a polarization of global politics not seen since the 1930s.
00:14:47.366 --> 00:14:51.642
And speaking of that international community, another question must be asked here.
00:14:51.642 --> 00:15:02.508
This is one of those tough questions Could Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February of 2022 been prevented?
00:15:02.508 --> 00:15:10.582
Sergei has something to say about that, in fact something to write about that.
00:15:11.203 --> 00:15:37.232
Going back to the book, concern about Soviet and then Russian objections to NATO membership for East European countries was the key factor behind President George H W Bush's refusal to contemplate NATO's expansion beyond Germany's Eastern borders, although he insisted on keeping the organization in existence after the Cold War.
00:15:37.232 --> 00:15:44.895
So this is Bush 41 saying we're not going to expand NATO beyond Germany's Eastern borders.
00:15:44.895 --> 00:15:57.347
Going back to the book, it was also a major reason why many members of the Clinton administration rejected the pleas of East European leaders to join the alliance by 1993,.
00:15:57.347 --> 00:16:00.976
There was one more reason to question such expansion.
00:16:00.976 --> 00:16:07.537
The reason was Ukraine, or more specifically its denuclearization.
00:16:07.537 --> 00:16:20.557
Clinton Secretary of State Warren Christopher formulated the Ukraine problem as follows it is hard to see how Ukraine can accept being the buffer between NATO, europe and Russia.
00:16:20.557 --> 00:16:27.176
This will militate against our efforts to get rid of Ukraine's nuclear weapons.
00:16:28.424 --> 00:16:47.369
The direct link between nuclear weapons and the desirability of NATO membership for the East European countries was demonstrated in 1992, when some Polish officials suggested to their American counterparts that they would acquire nuclear weapons if not allowed to join NATO.
00:16:47.369 --> 00:17:02.669
The prospect of a nuclear armed Poland facing a newly aggressive Russia frightened many in Washington, and some were prepared to offer NATO membership to the Ukrainians as a carrot to give up their nuclear arsenal.
00:17:02.669 --> 00:17:16.887
Frightened by the possibility of losing their weapons while getting stuck in the grey zone between NATO and Russia, ukrainian diplomats tried to jump on the East European bandwagon to join the alliance.
00:17:16.887 --> 00:17:38.474
Now, later on, we read in the Clinton administration in April 1993, when Clinton met with Valencia and Havel in Washington and both leaders raised the issue of NATO membership, the US president began to rethink the more cautious policies of his predecessor.
00:17:38.474 --> 00:17:43.513
But there were two main obstacles on the Eastern European road to the alliance.
00:17:43.513 --> 00:17:46.230
One was opposition from Russia.
00:17:46.230 --> 00:17:57.248
The other was concern about Ukraine, which still retained its nuclear weapons and was extremely apprehensive about finding itself in a no man's land between NATO and Russia.
00:17:57.248 --> 00:18:02.999
Russian opposition to NATO expansion presented a problem.
00:18:02.999 --> 00:18:13.386
But the Clinton administration was also concerned that, whatever position Yeltsin took, such expansion would embolden his domestic critics.
00:18:13.386 --> 00:18:29.911
If NATO adopted an anti-Russian rationale for taking in new members, it could tip the balance of forces in Russian politics in exactly the direction we feared, Wrote Clinton's point man on Russia in Eastern Europe, straub Talbot.
00:18:33.424 --> 00:18:45.676
The breakthrough on Russia came in August 1993 when Lewenza reached an informal agreement with Yeltsin to ensure Poland's membership in NATO at the expense of Ukraine.
00:18:45.676 --> 00:18:50.974
The terms were that Russia would not oppose Poland's application to join the alliance.
00:18:50.974 --> 00:18:59.009
In exchange, poland would not involve itself in Ukrainian affairs unless there was a military crisis in Ukraine.
00:18:59.009 --> 00:19:03.394
Although highly informal, the deal was upheld.
00:19:03.394 --> 00:19:09.173
Russia raised no objections to East Europeans joining the alliance.
00:19:09.173 --> 00:19:12.808
But the line was drawn at the Ukrainian border.
00:19:12.808 --> 00:19:17.834
And then we get to the bottom line answer.
00:19:17.834 --> 00:19:19.608
Here we go back to Polki.
00:19:20.664 --> 00:19:38.215
But key European members of NATO, france and Germany in particular, blocked the decision advocated by the United States and supported by the new East European members of the alliance to grant Ukraine and Georgia a membership action plan.
00:19:38.215 --> 00:19:42.814
We agree today that these countries would become members of NATO.
00:19:42.814 --> 00:19:49.326
Read the declaration before, making it clear that no ascension would take place anytime soon.
00:19:49.326 --> 00:20:02.596
The map membership action plan was promised, but not given, on the basis that the two potential applicants still had to meet some specific criteria in order to qualify.
00:20:02.596 --> 00:20:17.230
We will now begin a period of intensive engagement with both at a high political level to address the questions still outstanding pertaining to their map applications Again, the membership action plan.
00:20:17.230 --> 00:20:25.548
The matter was postponed and would not return to the NATO agenda at the next summit or the one after that.
00:20:27.085 --> 00:20:37.691
One knew that the decision to deny map to the two post-Soviet republics was a concession to their former master, russia.
00:20:37.691 --> 00:20:57.315
So France and Germany blocked NATO membership of Ukraine in 2008 and they pulled the old Washington two-step we're going to do something for you without really doing anything.
00:20:57.315 --> 00:21:02.196
Thus, that's why you get this word solid of a quote.
00:21:02.196 --> 00:21:05.653
We agreed today that these countries would become members of NATO.
00:21:05.653 --> 00:21:11.606
Read the declaration before making it clear that no ascension would take place anytime soon.
00:21:11.606 --> 00:21:22.292
There was outstanding questions of the two potential applicants the old Washington two-step let's do something for you without doing anything for you.
00:21:22.292 --> 00:21:25.672
And that is exactly what France and Germany did.
00:21:26.984 --> 00:21:47.137
Now, interestingly enough, just a few months after this vote, at the NATO summit on August 8th 2008, russia invaded the former Republic of Georgia under the pretenses of South Ossetia, which had seceded from Georgia in the early 1990s.
00:21:47.137 --> 00:21:59.792
Russia said they needed protection and within four days, the larger or more powerful Russian army had overwhelmed the Georgia fighting force and was at the outskirts of the capital.
00:21:59.792 --> 00:22:10.713
Then a ceasefire was brokered with by then French President, nicholas Sarkozy, to halt the hostilities, but the die had been cast.
00:22:10.713 --> 00:22:20.118
The invasion of Georgia was a clear message to Ukraine that you better not step over the line.
00:22:20.118 --> 00:22:29.171
No matter what had happened in NATO the fact that you were not an official NATO member you still had questions outstanding.
00:22:29.171 --> 00:22:35.049
Putin invaded Georgia because of that weakness and Georgia's never recovered.
00:22:35.049 --> 00:22:42.970
They're now just a puppet satellite state of Russia, and Ukraine is holding on for dear life.
00:22:46.105 --> 00:22:51.317
Our fifth question is what is the role of NATO in the Russo-Ukrainian war?
00:22:51.317 --> 00:22:57.674
We just covered that for the most part, nato conventional thinking says NATO has backed Ukraine.
00:22:57.674 --> 00:23:04.278
It's condemned Russia's actions and provided support in terms of capacity building and advisory roles.
00:23:04.278 --> 00:23:18.252
However, ukraine is not a NATO member, so it just limits the extent of NATO's involvement and, if we can be frank, nato has been completely impotent.
00:23:18.252 --> 00:23:25.672
In the 2008 invasion of Georgia, the Soviet Republic, it frankly did nothing to help them.
00:23:25.672 --> 00:23:29.334
They were essentially completely caught off guard.
00:23:29.334 --> 00:23:36.737
And NATO did nothing in the 2014 annexation of Crimea in eastern Ukraine by Russia.
00:23:36.737 --> 00:23:47.051
So both 2008 and 2014, they were completely impotent, so NATO is essentially almost worthless.
00:23:47.051 --> 00:23:57.230
Now number six of our 10 questions how has the Russo-Ukrainian war affected Ukraine's economy and people?
00:23:57.230 --> 00:24:00.212
And how about the Russian economy and the Russian people?
00:24:00.212 --> 00:24:08.138
Well, from our research, the war has caused significant damage to Ukraine's economy and infrastructure.
00:24:08.138 --> 00:24:18.428
Now, additionally, it's led to a humanitarian crisis, with thousands dead and over 3.5 million people displaced.
00:24:18.428 --> 00:24:24.994
Now here's what Sergei Polki says about the Russian economy.
00:24:24.994 --> 00:24:26.626
This is very interesting.
00:24:26.708 --> 00:24:45.813
I thought Europe's turn away from Russian oil and pledged to drastically cut its consumption of Russian gas began to close the European market for Russian energy much earlier than proponents of Europe's long-term strategy.
00:24:45.813 --> 00:24:52.777
The achievement of net-zero-net greenhouse emissions by 2050 had expected.
00:24:52.777 --> 00:25:03.654
Loss of the most lucrative European markets promised nothing good for a country 60% of whose government revenues were generated by energy exports.
00:25:03.654 --> 00:25:10.317
Germany depended on Russian gas for 55% of its energy before the war.
00:25:10.317 --> 00:25:14.251
Reduce that share to slightly more than one-third of its supply.
00:25:14.251 --> 00:25:22.196
In the first months of the war, it also made plans to build a new LNG terminals for American liquefied natural gas.
00:25:22.196 --> 00:25:34.953
By July of 2022, europe was already importing more LNG from the United States than the amount of natural gas it had previously bought from Russia.
00:25:34.953 --> 00:25:46.276
That's a fascinating series of statistics there by Sergei, so you can see Europe is banding together to help each other out.
00:25:46.276 --> 00:25:48.346
It was very good.
00:25:48.346 --> 00:26:00.375
At least the Biden administration actually saw, and did well to anticipate, that we needed to turn on the spickets for LNG exports.
00:26:00.375 --> 00:26:04.873
So they get a check mark for doing something good.
00:26:07.105 --> 00:26:15.617
Now our seventh question is what Russian objectives have been solved in the Russo-Ukrainian War.
00:26:15.617 --> 00:26:20.375
The Russia's objectives in this war are multi-fold.
00:26:20.375 --> 00:26:30.477
They include reasserting its influence over the former Soviet territories, protecting Russian-speaking populations and countering Western expansion.
00:26:30.477 --> 00:26:41.473
That's the novel, or the general conventional thinking, and I thought Sergei seemed almost prophetic when he wrote these paragraphs.
00:26:41.473 --> 00:26:54.384
There are clear indications that the Ukrainian nation will merge from this war more united in certain of its identity than at any other point in its modern history.
00:26:54.384 --> 00:27:04.182
Moreover, ukraine's successful resistance to Russian aggression is destined to promote Russia's own nation building project.
00:27:04.182 --> 00:27:24.987
Russia and its elites now have little choice but to reimagine their country's identity by parting ways not only with the imperialism of the Tsarist past, but also with the anarchistic model of Russian nation consisting of Russians, ukrainians and Belarusians.
00:27:24.987 --> 00:27:44.905
By paying an enormous price in wealth and in the blood of its citizens, ukraine is terminating the era of Russian dominance in a good part of Eastern Europe and challenging Moscow's claim to primacy to the rest of the post-Soviet space.
00:27:44.905 --> 00:27:47.318
That's extremely powerful.
00:27:48.835 --> 00:27:55.681
The impact of the Russo-Ukrainian war has already been felt far beyond the former possessions of the Romanovs and Commissars.
00:27:55.681 --> 00:28:11.585
Ukraine survived the Russian assault and defended itself thanks to the unprecedented solidarity of the international community, which provided the Ukrainian government and the people with political, economic and military support on a scale not seen in decades.
00:28:11.585 --> 00:28:31.696
For many of Ukraine's friends, this war became not only the largest and deadliest military conflict in Europe since the end of World War II, but also the first major war since the victory over Nazism in which there were few shades of gray when it came to its moral dimensions.
00:28:31.696 --> 00:28:53.086
It was the first quote good war since the global conflict in 1939 to 1945 in which it was very clear from the start who was the aggressor and who was the victim, who was the villain and who the hero, and whose side one wanted to be on.
00:28:55.095 --> 00:29:03.442
Russian aggression against Ukraine produced a 19th century war, fought with 20th century tactics and 21st century weaponry.
00:29:03.442 --> 00:29:12.482
Its ideological underpinnings came from the visions of territorial expansion that characterized the Russian Imperial Era.
00:29:12.482 --> 00:29:31.826
Its strategy was borrowed by the Kremlin from World War II and post-war era manuals of the Soviet Army, and its key features were not only precision guided missiles, but also intelligence gathering satellites and cyber warfare, used to different degrees by both sides.
00:29:31.826 --> 00:29:36.344
The war posed a nuclear threat to the world from its very inception.
00:29:36.344 --> 00:29:59.384
Russia's takeover of the Chernobyl nuclear site and the Zephyr-Vezina nuclear power plan in the first days of the all-out conflict constituted a clear and present danger to the part of Europe and the Middle East, as well as a challenge To the safety of nuclear installations worldwide.
00:30:00.795 --> 00:30:02.901
Now moving on to our eighth question of 10.
00:30:02.901 --> 00:30:08.025
How has the Russo-Ukrainian War impacted global politics?
00:30:08.025 --> 00:30:25.558
Well, the conventional answer is it's significantly impacted global politics, straining Russian's relationship with the West and causing shifts in geopolitical alliances, especially with China.
00:30:25.558 --> 00:30:37.143
And, as we will see in Saturday's episode, this war was caused by the United States' weakness in other areas of the world, namely in Afghanistan.
00:30:37.143 --> 00:30:40.117
But let's hear from now.
00:30:40.117 --> 00:30:47.642
Let's hear from what Sergei has to say about China and Russia and their coming together in their closeness.
00:30:47.642 --> 00:30:49.376
Very interesting.
00:30:51.394 --> 00:31:06.884
In early February, having already made up his mind to invade Ukraine, vladimir Putin flew to Beijing there to figure as a guest of honor at the opening ceremonies of the Winter Olympic Games hosted by Xi Jinping.
00:31:06.884 --> 00:31:19.675
The two met and released a photo in which Putin did not keep his distance from his Chinese counterpart, as he had been doing in meetings with Western leaders during the previous few weeks.
00:31:19.675 --> 00:31:36.122
President Xi and Putin also released a 5,000-word statement declaring friendship and cooperation with quote no limits or quote forbidden areas of cooperation between their countries, which suggested military cooperation.
00:31:36.122 --> 00:31:55.143
Even so, the declaration fell short of a formal alliance, since China still considers the international order hierarchical and has not regarded Russia as its equal historically and culturally, let alone in terms of economic power and potential.
00:31:55.143 --> 00:32:05.217
The document called the New Agreement Superior to Political and Military Alliances of the Cold War Era Interesting language.
00:32:05.217 --> 00:32:05.458
There.
00:32:07.315 --> 00:32:13.579
There were no specifics about how the partnership would work, but there were particular statements about geopolitics.
00:32:13.579 --> 00:32:27.646
President Xi had publicly supported Putin's opposition to the eastward expansion of NATO, the key reason that the master of the Kremlin had provided to justify his imminent aggression.
00:32:27.646 --> 00:32:49.000
Putin in turn supported China's claims on Taiwan and both leaders to clear their opposition to the quote advancement of US plans to develop global missile defense and deploy its elements in various regions of the world, and with capacity building of high precision non-nuclear weapons for disarming strikes and other strategic objectives.
00:32:49.000 --> 00:32:56.586
It's not clear to what extent the coming war in Ukraine was discussed at the summit.
00:32:56.586 --> 00:33:06.904
But Putin could not afford not to mention the war at all, otherwise he would have killed the quote no limits friendship before it began.
00:33:06.904 --> 00:33:20.219
Now, western intelligence found that President Xi did not want the war to start before the closing ceremonies of the Olympic Games, so as not to distract world attention from his great achievement.
00:33:20.219 --> 00:33:24.160
Very interesting indeed.
00:33:24.875 --> 00:33:33.786
Moving on to our ninth of 10 questions, what is the stance of the United States on this Russo-Ukrainian war?
00:33:33.786 --> 00:33:44.604
Well, continuing with our conventional wisdom, the United States has condemned Russia's actions and has offered significant support to Ukraine.
00:33:44.604 --> 00:33:57.338
This includes sanctions against Russia, financial aid to Ukraine albeit a lot a crap ton and military assistance.
00:33:57.338 --> 00:34:04.547
Now Sergei says this about US foreign policy towards Ukraine and Russia.
00:34:04.547 --> 00:34:21.617
Going back to his book, although the Biden administration was at pains to make clear that it had no intention of involving the United States in the Russo-Ukrainian war, the President's rhetoric was redolent of the Cold War.
00:34:21.617 --> 00:34:30.041
In that tradition, his speech was billed as remarks on the United Efforts of the Free World to support the people of Ukraine.
00:34:30.041 --> 00:34:39.420
There were indeed four references to the West or Western world and 20 uses of the words Free and Freedom.
00:34:39.420 --> 00:34:46.878
For anyone listening to Biden's speech on that March evening in Warsaw or watching it on television around the world.
00:34:46.878 --> 00:34:57.360
There was no doubt the United States was back in Europe to lead its allies in the battle for freedom against an old enemy and that the West as a whole was involved in the struggle.
00:34:57.360 --> 00:35:18.545
The joint actions of Americans and Europeans, with their provisions of military and economic assistance to Ukraine and the sheltering of refugees and, most controversially, the imposition of joint sanctions on Russia, indicated a revival of the Cold War-era alliance.
00:35:18.545 --> 00:35:30.409
Now our final question, question 10, what can be done to resolve this Russo-Ukrainian war?
00:35:30.409 --> 00:35:37.626
Well, the conventional wisdom says the resolution is going to require diplomatic negotiations.
00:35:37.626 --> 00:35:49.121
On the Ukrainian side, there has to be respect for its sovereignty and there has to be international pressure on Russia to cease its actions.
00:35:49.121 --> 00:36:05.427
Now it's a complex issue that requires persistent efforts from all stakeholders and it's going to be very nuanced how they're going to get to a final agreement, a final peace agreement.
00:36:05.427 --> 00:36:09.880
Now Sergei has a final word to say about this.
00:36:13.155 --> 00:36:24.914
The war buried Russia's hopes of becoming a new global center in the multipolar world envisioned by Russian politicians and diplomats since the 1990s.
00:36:24.914 --> 00:36:33.521
It exposed weaknesses not only in Russia's clearly overrated and overpromoted army, but also in its economic potential.
00:36:33.521 --> 00:36:52.507
In that context, the decisions of Sweden and Finland to join NATO were not just reactions to the threat posed by Putin's rogue regime, but also realizations that a significantly weakened Russia was in no condition to prevent their move.
00:36:52.507 --> 00:37:00.344
That's very interesting that Sweden and Finland were now able to join Russia, or now able to join NATO.
00:37:00.344 --> 00:37:05.501
As Opposing to Russia, they have always been under their sphere of influence.
00:37:07.070 --> 00:37:10.420
Going back to the book, russia, for its part, was left without allies.
00:37:10.420 --> 00:37:27.963
It forced the Belarusian strongman, alexander Lashenko, whom it had saved in 2020 from the revolt of his own people, to allow the use of Belarusian territory for its attack on Ukraine, but failed to persuade him to join the war.
00:37:27.963 --> 00:37:47.097
There was even less support from the members of the CSTO, that's, the collective security treaty organization, the Russian-led military alliance of the former Soviet republics of our media Kazakhstan, kyrgyzstan to Jikistan, uzbekistan.
00:37:47.097 --> 00:38:05.739
Outside the former Soviet Union, russia's main diplomatic achievement was alliance with Iran and neutrality of Turkey, which sees the opportunity afforded by the isolation and the weakening of Russia to establish itself as a regional power beyond the Middle East.
00:38:05.739 --> 00:38:12.929
That was a swift move by President Ergon in Turkey to do that.
00:38:12.929 --> 00:38:21.244
Now China put limits on its quote no limits agreement to cooperate with China within weeks of having signed it.
00:38:21.244 --> 00:38:47.483
While publicly expressing the concern that it shared with Russia about NATO's posture in Europe, beijing provided Moscow with limited political and economic support and, to the best of current knowledge, no military assistance and, that is a key point, no military assistance by China to Russia, as far as we know.
00:38:49.710 --> 00:39:01.324
So have we learned anything in the last 25 years in terms of American foreign policy, especially with this engagement or with this war in Ukraine by Russian aggression?
00:39:01.324 --> 00:39:03.653
We hope so.
00:39:03.653 --> 00:39:12.512
Right now, support for the Ukrainian war seems to be Good.
00:39:12.512 --> 00:39:14.014
It seems to be winning.
00:39:14.014 --> 00:39:26.878
Now that all said, we have never had any formal joint resolution by Congress on Providing all this funding to Ukraine.
00:39:26.878 --> 00:39:29.023
So there is a problem with that.
00:39:29.023 --> 00:39:38.418
But there's always been problems with funding wars that the executive branch wants to help and provide financial aid.
00:39:38.418 --> 00:39:40.704
So there's always been that dichotomy.
00:39:40.704 --> 00:39:42.289
There's always been that tension, no matter who is in power.
00:39:42.289 --> 00:39:57.250
But there has been a crap ton of financial aid sent to Ukraine and very, very little conversation and Votes around it in Congress, which is a huge problem.
00:40:00.599 --> 00:40:04.028
Now here's a bonus question and a bonus book recommendation.
00:40:04.028 --> 00:40:13.668
After everything, we just heard how difficult and how nuanced that part of the world is, and there's various parts of the world that are like this.
00:40:13.668 --> 00:40:25.248
But our bonus question is should America Be the world's policeman, especially after everything we just heard?
00:40:25.248 --> 00:40:46.333
Especially after everything we just heard, and a bonus book recommendation for you is Brett Stevens, who was the author of the 2014 book titled America in Retreat the new isolationism and the coming global disorder Very good book.
00:40:46.333 --> 00:40:50.210
He tries to tackle that question should America be the world's policeman?
00:40:50.210 --> 00:40:53.757
And real quick to answer that.
00:40:53.757 --> 00:40:55.643
He would answer that this way.
00:40:57.349 --> 00:41:06.338
Whenever this question is asked that's always been asked for nearly a hundred years the answer is usually no, america should not be the world's policeman.
00:41:06.338 --> 00:41:12.262
And Brett Stevens would say progressives will say that it suggests American arrogance.