Feb. 13, 2024

MM#305--Philosophy 101--Descartes

FAN MAIL--We would love YOUR feedback--Send us a Text Message Could the very fabric of modern philosophy pivot on the thoughts of one 17th-century Frenchman? Prepare to be immersed in the revolutionary ideas of René Descartes, as we continue our Philosophy 101 series with a profound dive into his quest for clarity and certainty. Through engaging with Peter Kreeft's insightful work "Socrates' Children," we map out Descartes' determination to forge a new path in philosophical discourse, influ...

FAN MAIL--We would love YOUR feedback--Send us a Text Message

Could the very fabric of modern philosophy pivot on the thoughts of one 17th-century Frenchman?

Prepare to be immersed in the revolutionary ideas of René Descartes, as we continue our Philosophy 101 series with a profound dive into his quest for clarity and certainty. Through engaging with Peter Kreeft's insightful work "Socrates' Children," we map out Descartes' determination to forge a new path in philosophical discourse, influenced by the burgeoning scientific developments of his time.

By examining the contrast between empirical data and pure intellectual intuition, I illuminate how Descartes' desire to establish a firm foundation for philosophy led him to a methodology that paralleled the exactness of mathematics, yet remained deeply rooted in traditional philosophical inquiry.

Key Points from the Episode:

This episode navigates the complex intersections of Descartes' life as a scientist, mathematician, and philosopher, unraveling his pursuit of indubitable knowledge and the birth of his pivotal assertion "Cogito, ergo sum."
We reflect on the intellectual humility required when confronting the vastness of the universe and the implications of Descartes' skepticism for the epistemological challenges that have occupied thinkers ever since.
While delving into the caution required to handle his methodic doubt, we also explore the role of hope and faith in our search for understanding, drawing parallels with Christian beliefs in recognizing the existence of a Creator.

Join us as we confront the legacy of Descartes, whose contributions have shaped not only the trajectory of philosophy but also the way we grapple with the profoundest of life's questions.

Other resources:

Philosophy 101--Aristotle

Philosophy 101--Plato

Philosophy 101--Socrates

Philosophy 101--Augustine

Philosophy 101--Aquinas, part 1

More goodness
Get your FREE Academy Review here!

Get our top book recommendations list

Get new podcast episodes dropped into your email box easily

Want to leave a review? Click here, and if we earned a five-star review from you **high five and knuckle bumps**, we appreciate it greatly, thank you so much!

Because we care what you think about what we think and our website, please email David@teammojoacademy.com, or if you want to leave us a quick FREE, painless voicemail, we would appreciate that as well.

00:07 - Philosophy Through Descartes and Scientific Method

10:12 - Descartes and His Philosophical Contributions

24:53 - The Importance of Epistemological Problems

WEBVTT

00:00:07.608 --> 00:00:20.806
Welcome to the Theory to Action podcast, where we examine the timeless treasures of wisdom from the great books in less time, to help you take action immediately and ultimately to create and lead a flourishing life.

00:00:20.806 --> 00:00:24.849
Now here's your host, David Kaiser.

00:00:25.960 --> 00:00:30.750
Hello, I am David and welcome back to another Mojo Minute.

00:00:30.750 --> 00:00:54.310
Roughly about a year ago we started a Philosophy 101 series and we did it with a fantastic four volume series of books called Socrates Children by the great Peter Krief, and so last year we nailed down some of what Mr Krief what he calls the Big Nine.

00:00:54.310 --> 00:01:04.486
Those would be the philosophers of Socrates, aristotle, plato, aquinas which we did a two-parter on and Augustine.

00:01:04.486 --> 00:01:13.966
So far we've covered five of those of the Big Nine and I'll put links in the show notes for those Mojo Minutes.

00:01:13.966 --> 00:01:28.947
But today, today we're going to kick back off our Philosophy 101 series for this year, because we will be covering the remaining four of the Big Nine, and the remaining four are Descartes, hume, kant and Hegel.

00:01:28.947 --> 00:02:18.227
And I thought it's best that we start this process the week of Christian Lent, which will be beginning tomorrow after this recording Wednesday, as Wednesday will be tomorrow once you're listening to this Because philosophy does impact theology, and Christian Lent is the imitation of Jesus Christ fasting in the wilderness before he began his public ministry, and while we don't have a don't necessarily need to go out into the wilderness to fully imitate our Lord, we can go on intellectual and a spiritual retreat of sorts to help us clean up our lives and to get things back in their proper order.

00:02:18.879 --> 00:02:29.570
Certainly, repentance is a good practice during Lent and is highly encouraged, but also getting our priorities and our lives correct again if they happen to be out of sorts.

00:02:29.570 --> 00:02:47.508
That good housekeeping and house cleaning is another way to ensure we worship our Creator as proper, as is proper for the creature to do, and we are the creatures and that's the first humble submission.

00:02:47.508 --> 00:03:01.889
We need to understand in philosophical terms that we are the creature, not the Creator, and that virtue of humility always comes in, as we've seen in many of these mojo minutes over and over again.

00:03:01.889 --> 00:03:05.044
It's possibly the greatest virtue you can even acquire.

00:03:05.044 --> 00:03:08.001
It helps you out in all facets of life.

00:03:08.001 --> 00:03:23.438
So with that administrative housekeeping out of the way, let us turn to our subject for today and with humility, let us learn from Socrates' Children by Peter Krief, as we cover now number six.

00:03:23.739 --> 00:03:27.586
Philosopher of the big nine, rené Descartes.

00:03:27.586 --> 00:03:30.137
Go on to the book.

00:03:30.137 --> 00:03:36.503
René Descartes lived from 1596 to 1650.

00:03:36.503 --> 00:03:47.207
Descartes' discourse on method, written in 1637, changed the philosophical landscape.

00:03:47.207 --> 00:03:56.461
It made more of a difference to how philosophy was done than any other book ever written, except perhaps Plato's dialogues.

00:03:57.155 --> 00:04:12.401
Every major philosopher for the next 200 years, except Pascal, followed Descartes in attempting to apply some aspects of the scientific method to philosophy, though they all produced different philosophical systems than Descartes.

00:04:12.401 --> 00:04:16.081
Descartes' revolution was similar to that of Socrates.

00:04:16.081 --> 00:04:28.579
Both changed the meaning of reason itself by tightening it, so to speak, and Socrates was the first person in history who clearly understood and practiced the art of deductive reasoning.

00:04:28.579 --> 00:04:36.999
While Descartes was the first to deliberately apply to philosophy the new scientific method, perhaps he was the second.

00:04:36.999 --> 00:04:50.826
Bacon had done this too before Descartes, but where Bacon emphasized the empirical and the inductive aspect of the scientific method, descartes emphasized the mathematical and deductive aspect of it.

00:04:52.095 --> 00:04:55.223
Why did Descartes try to do philosophy by a new method?

00:04:55.223 --> 00:05:03.581
Because he noticed two things that every one of the sciences had progressed remarkably in his age and that philosophy had not.

00:05:03.581 --> 00:05:06.240
He asked the simple question why?

00:05:06.240 --> 00:05:07.718
What made the difference?

00:05:07.718 --> 00:05:10.860
And his answer was the scientific method.

00:05:10.860 --> 00:05:17.819
That was the common factor in the progress of all the sciences, yet no one had applied it to philosophy.

00:05:17.819 --> 00:05:36.262
He then asked what is or what was in this new method that gave it the power to progress to a point where disagreements were actually settled conclusively for the first time in history, and he answered the method of mathematics.

00:05:36.262 --> 00:05:39.000
He wrote in this.

00:05:39.822 --> 00:06:01.403
I took especially great pleasure in mathematics because of the certainty in the evidence of its arguments, but I did not yet notice its true usefulness and, thinking that it seemed useful only to the mathematical arts, I was astonished that, because its foundations were so solid and firm, no one had built anything more noble upon them.

00:06:01.403 --> 00:06:12.867
On the other hand, I had compared the writings of the ancient pagans who discussed morals to very proud, magnificent palaces that are built on nothing but sand and mud.

00:06:12.867 --> 00:06:25.906
They place virtues on a high plateau and make them appear to be valued more than anything else in the world, but they do not sufficiently instruct us about how to know them.

00:06:25.906 --> 00:06:40.007
If we can imagine a great palace on a foundation of sand next to the little shed on a foundation of rock, we can see why Descartes wanted to rebuild that old palace on a new foundation.

00:06:40.007 --> 00:06:59.704
After all, descartes' buildings quote unquote, ie his essential conclusions that God and the world, mind and matter, soul and body all exist, are quite traditional, but his method of proving them, the new foundation, is radically new.

00:06:59.704 --> 00:07:04.101
Socrates II was also both traditional and radical.

00:07:04.101 --> 00:07:10.504
In the same way, descartes' revolution can best be defined by comparing Plato's dividing line.

00:07:11.226 --> 00:07:21.882
In the Republic, plato distinguishes four levels of reason and thus of education First, seeing second hand images of real things.

00:07:21.882 --> 00:07:26.964
Second, the first hand sense perception of the real things.

00:07:26.964 --> 00:07:30.942
Third, the logical and mathematical reasoning.

00:07:30.942 --> 00:07:38.906
And number four, the intellectual intuition, wisdom or understanding of the eternal forms.

00:07:38.906 --> 00:07:53.305
And then, finally, the scientific method essentially emits number one and number four For opposite reasons, because number one is too low and number four is too high.

00:07:53.305 --> 00:07:59.721
It combines number two, the observation of the empirical data, with number three, the exact reasoning.

00:07:59.721 --> 00:08:09.774
And Descartes' method demands mathematical exactness, what he calls clear and distinct ideas, like numbers.

00:08:09.774 --> 00:08:15.718
His ideal is a universal mathematical science.

00:08:15.718 --> 00:08:34.777
So we can see René Descartes was strongly influenced by the scientific method, by the progress of the Renaissance and why philosophy had not progressed as far as it should when he looked out at other fields of study.

00:08:36.669 --> 00:08:39.697
Now let's learn a little bit about Descartes' life.

00:08:39.697 --> 00:08:50.639
It's probably not possible to decide whether Descartes' attempt to do philosophy by the method of science can work until we see how he does it.

00:08:50.639 --> 00:09:20.120
But even if his attempt to prove can be somewhat confusing and a failure, the attempt was inevitable Because philosophy was in a sorry state in 1637, divided between number one verbal quibbles in partisan battles among unoriginal late medieval scholastics who used highly technical language and multiplied abstract verbal distractions and distinctions.

00:09:20.120 --> 00:09:25.740
And number two by Flaky Nature Mystics and Occultists like Perichalesis.

00:09:25.740 --> 00:09:32.020
And number three by Smart but cynical skeptics like Montague.

00:09:32.020 --> 00:09:39.863
Other science had made more progress in the previous 200 years than in the previous 2000,.

00:09:39.863 --> 00:09:41.293
But not philosophy.

00:09:41.293 --> 00:09:42.037
Why?

00:09:42.037 --> 00:09:44.856
Descartes' answer seemed obvious.

00:09:44.856 --> 00:09:50.322
The scientific method was the fuel that sent all the other rockets and sciences up.

00:09:50.322 --> 00:09:53.716
Why not use it for philosophy too?

00:09:53.716 --> 00:09:57.374
Now a little bit about Descartes' life.

00:09:57.374 --> 00:10:02.298
Descartes was the man to do just that.

00:10:02.298 --> 00:10:09.182
He was the man to send that rocket ship that all the other scientists have used.

00:10:09.182 --> 00:10:12.037
He was the man to use that for philosophy.

00:10:12.629 --> 00:10:15.619
He was one of the most intelligent men who had ever lived.

00:10:15.619 --> 00:10:19.778
He thought of himself primarily as a scientist rather than a philosopher.

00:10:19.778 --> 00:10:29.059
He personally knew all the great scientists of his day, many of whom congregated around the Circle of Friends in Paris, of which Descartes was the center.

00:10:29.059 --> 00:10:32.258
He made essential contributions in geometry.

00:10:32.258 --> 00:10:41.884
He actually invented analytic geometry, optics, astronomy, physiology and other sciences.

00:10:41.884 --> 00:10:47.140
He was the last of the universal geniuses before the age of specialization.

00:10:47.140 --> 00:11:01.153
He summarized in his intellectual biography briefly and charmingly, in the discourse on method that he was trained in the best Jesuit schools in the world, interacting with all the great minds of his age.

00:11:02.350 --> 00:11:10.985
He sought certainty rather than probability or arguments from fittedness or from authority.

00:11:10.985 --> 00:11:13.597
And he found certainty nowhere except in mathematics.

00:11:13.597 --> 00:11:29.315
He wondered why this exact reasoning had been confined to quantity, the number alone, and not applied to the great questions of philosophy such as knowledge, the nature of knowledge, truth, human nature, god and the soul.

00:11:29.315 --> 00:11:58.796
One day, returning from the battlefields of the Thirty Years' War, which terribly traumatized Europe and tarnished the religions that caused it, while snowbound in a little heated room, he conceived the essential idea for a whole new philosophy, which was number one, to come from his own individual mind rather than relying on the great philosophers of the past, number two, to begin with his own experience.

00:11:58.796 --> 00:12:04.394
And number three, to use only logical reasoning in the scientific method.

00:12:04.394 --> 00:12:10.580
This was the beginning of the career of the most famous philosopher in the world.

00:12:10.580 --> 00:12:18.855
The end came when the Queen of Sweden, a would-be intellectual herself, persuaded Descartes to come to Sweden to instruct her.

00:12:18.855 --> 00:12:31.731
Descartes accepted but died of pneumonia brought on by the Swedish winner in the Queen's demand to rise at 4.30 am to give her philosophy lessons.

00:12:35.190 --> 00:12:47.837
Descartes was one of the most… well educated geniuses of his time actually had thought of himself more of a scientist than a philosopher.

00:12:47.837 --> 00:12:53.236
But that was again the sorry state of philosophy during the time that he lived.

00:12:53.236 --> 00:13:31.168
And so you can see and Cref makes this point as you dig into his biography even more and read in depth all about his philosophies of life, especially in his discourse on the method that Descartes wanted to have the certainty that is just frankly not possible on some aspects of human nature, of God, of evil, of universal theories.

00:13:31.168 --> 00:13:45.485
The universe is just too vast and you have to have some humility that perhaps God has not revealed everything that you, as the creature, are asking.

00:13:45.485 --> 00:13:52.008
It seems, at least from my reading, that Descartes could not understand that humility.

00:13:52.008 --> 00:14:01.778
He wanted the exactness of mathematical reasoning to prove with certainty that some of these theories were true.

00:14:01.778 --> 00:14:10.696
That's a long way to go and I'm surprised they spent most of his life trying to solve for it.

00:14:13.394 --> 00:14:39.760
Now, descartes is famously known for two things his universal methodic doubt that's one important aspect that we're going to cover real quick and the other thing is his famous phrase cadetto ergo sum, not good in my Latin cog itto ergo sum, cog itto ergo sum.

00:14:39.760 --> 00:14:40.302
I think.

00:14:40.302 --> 00:14:46.255
Therefore, I am, and this is kind of his Archimedean point.

00:14:46.255 --> 00:15:00.477
That famous phrase that I think therefore I am, begins his relentless pursuit of trying to overcome doubt.

00:15:00.477 --> 00:15:06.663
Let's learn about this universal methodic doubt now.

00:15:06.663 --> 00:15:07.658
Go on the book.

00:15:09.634 --> 00:15:12.264
Role number one is the most important and radical one.

00:15:12.264 --> 00:15:23.777
It consists of a universal methodic doubt, and number in part two of that is the clarity and distinctness of an idea as the test of its truth.

00:15:23.777 --> 00:15:35.322
Descartes, far from embracing doubt about his conclusion, like the skeptics, wants to overcome it more definitively than ever before.

00:15:35.322 --> 00:15:38.701
He demands not just truth but certainty.

00:15:38.701 --> 00:15:44.884
But to do that, he begins, as his premise, with more total doubt than ever before.

00:15:44.884 --> 00:15:54.283
He climbs down the depth of the doubter's pit because he is convinced he has a lot of strong enough to escape into total sunlight.

00:15:54.283 --> 00:15:57.863
The doubt is only a methodic, not lived.

00:15:57.863 --> 00:16:00.349
He is not a skeptic.

00:16:00.349 --> 00:16:02.293
In fact he's the opposite of a skeptic.

00:16:02.293 --> 00:16:05.907
He doubts, or he demands absolute certainty.

00:16:05.907 --> 00:16:16.393
But to get there and that's his real problem but to get there, he begins with skepticism, with universal doubt as his method.

00:16:19.585 --> 00:16:25.275
Now you can read all about Ridney Descartes universal methodic doubt.

00:16:25.275 --> 00:16:44.671
I will not get into the weeds on what it is, just know that's what he was most famous, for it is literally a rabbit trail that we could spend over an hour on and still not have used our time wisely, at least not for this mojo minute.

00:16:44.671 --> 00:17:02.832
Now the second point Kagee Kito ergo sum I think, therefore, I am from Descartes is his second famous sentence and it's probably the single most famous sentence in the history of all philosophy.

00:17:02.832 --> 00:17:04.396
Let's learn about that.

00:17:04.396 --> 00:17:12.247
Going to the book, I think, therefore, I am as probably the single most famous sentence in the history of philosophy.

00:17:12.247 --> 00:17:19.407
It is Descartes first and foundational certainty, the first rung on his escape ladder from skepticism.

00:17:19.407 --> 00:17:22.776
It is his Archimedean point.

00:17:23.337 --> 00:17:38.946
Archimedes, the Greek scientist who discovered the power of the lever to move heavy objects was proportionate to the length of the lever, reputedly said give me only a lever long enough and a fulcrum to rest on it, and I can move the whole world.

00:17:38.946 --> 00:17:48.712
A philosopher's Archimedean point is his first premise, his starting point or his foundation for the rest of his philosophy.

00:17:48.712 --> 00:17:56.692
And here we pick up from the discourse on method, descartes famous work.

00:17:56.692 --> 00:18:03.276
I resolved to pretend that everything that had ever entered my mind was no more true than the illusions of my dreams.

00:18:03.276 --> 00:18:10.394
But immediately afterward I noticed that during the time I wanted us to think about everything was false.

00:18:10.394 --> 00:18:33.570
It was necessary that I, who thought thus be something, and noticing that this truth I think therefore I am was so firm and so certain that the most extravagant suppositions of the skeptics were unable to shake it, I judged that I could accept it without scruple as the first principle of the philosophy I was seeking.

00:18:35.936 --> 00:18:49.452
And later on, grief makes the wonderful point that Augustine, st Augustine, had used the same argument long ago in his work against the academics, but his version was debito ergo sum.

00:18:49.452 --> 00:18:53.060
I doubt, therefore.

00:18:53.060 --> 00:18:59.916
I am, but he had not based his whole subsequent philosophy on it, as Descartes is about to do so.

00:18:59.916 --> 00:19:10.146
Descartes had studied Augustine and clearly borrowed this argument from him without crediting him with it.

00:19:10.146 --> 00:19:15.276
For Descartes is claiming to begin his whole philosophy anew.

00:19:17.384 --> 00:19:22.355
And there is an obvious strength to Descartes' argument against skepticism.

00:19:22.355 --> 00:19:29.055
Even if a demon is deceiving me, I must exist in order for him to deceive me.

00:19:29.055 --> 00:19:33.653
So my own existence is the only thing I cannot doubt.

00:19:33.653 --> 00:19:49.338
But as grief makes the important point at the end of this paragraph, there is also weakness, and weakness is to Descartes Cagito ergo sum on his refutation of skepticism.

00:19:49.338 --> 00:20:00.371
And the most obvious weakness is that it is a deductive argument and thus presupposes unproved premises.

00:20:00.371 --> 00:20:12.891
The implied premises are whatever thinks exist, and the express premise is I think, and the conclusion is I exist.

00:20:14.585 --> 00:20:18.775
Now, this argument is totally and logically valid.

00:20:18.775 --> 00:20:23.012
The conclusion follows with logical necessity from its premises.

00:20:23.012 --> 00:20:28.515
Both its premises are true and all of its terms are unambiguous and clear.

00:20:28.515 --> 00:20:31.631
So there is nothing logically wrong with it.

00:20:31.631 --> 00:20:36.432
But, as grief makes the point, it is a syllogism.

00:20:36.432 --> 00:20:38.576
An argument with two premises.

00:20:38.576 --> 00:20:47.633
A total skeptic would doubt each premise and demand proof for them, and that would require two or more arguments with four or more premises.

00:20:47.633 --> 00:20:51.270
This process would never end.

00:20:51.270 --> 00:20:57.696
The skeptic would demand premises for the premises of the premises, etc.

00:20:57.696 --> 00:20:57.836
Etc.

00:20:57.836 --> 00:21:00.290
At infinitum.

00:21:01.865 --> 00:21:04.753
As one skeptic said, descartes should have written I think.

00:21:04.753 --> 00:21:05.527
I think.

00:21:05.527 --> 00:21:15.053
Therefore, I think I am, I think, and so you can see, descartes had a problem.

00:21:15.053 --> 00:21:26.625
He was so doubting in his philosophy that he could never get back up that ladder from the doubter's pit that he created himself.

00:21:26.625 --> 00:21:32.238
Now that's not to say that he's not somebody that we should study.

00:21:32.238 --> 00:21:56.029
After all, grief included him in his big nine, and you have to remember that Descartes is coming on the heels of the Renaissance, of that new emerging world where for the previous 200 years they had learned all different new fields of study.

00:21:56.029 --> 00:21:58.811
It was literally a flowering of knowledge.

00:21:58.811 --> 00:22:04.272
It's also the world of Copernicus and Kepler and Galileo.

00:22:04.272 --> 00:22:10.250
They were beginning to understand nature at a much deeper level.

00:22:10.250 --> 00:22:14.518
And Descartes is struggling with that.

00:22:14.518 --> 00:22:16.230
He's trying to make sense of all that.

00:22:16.230 --> 00:22:43.076
So we certainly can't fault him for his doubt, because he's actually credited with the basic foundations of physics and the fact that with doubt in physics you can actually begin to prove a lot of other things, and so he's really credited with that.

00:22:43.076 --> 00:22:49.673
The fact that the philosophical doubt is always there, it pushes physics to have to claim the truths.

00:22:50.765 --> 00:22:52.913
So we're going to turn just to wrap this up.

00:22:52.913 --> 00:23:03.810
I know this has been heavy, long, slogging through very dense philosophy that most of the time we don't cover here in mojo minutes.

00:23:03.810 --> 00:23:12.554
But we're going to turn to the great conversation of book on the historical introduction to philosophy by Norman Meckart.

00:23:12.554 --> 00:23:15.272
I've shared from this book before.

00:23:15.272 --> 00:23:21.076
It's a wonderful book, especially if you're a philosophy student.

00:23:21.076 --> 00:23:29.269
I picked this up a number of years ago and it's helped me to kind of separate the wheat and the chaff, so to speak.

00:23:29.269 --> 00:23:36.596
But in this we get a good summary of what Descartes had done and why.

00:23:36.596 --> 00:23:37.898
It's important to understanding.

00:23:37.898 --> 00:23:39.087
Let's go to that book.

00:23:41.424 --> 00:23:46.407
It's possible to argue whether Descartes is the last of the medievals, of the first of the moderns.

00:23:46.407 --> 00:24:01.509
Like most such arguments about transitional figures, there's truth on both sides, but that both philosophy and our general view of the world have been different ever since is indisputable.

00:24:01.509 --> 00:24:13.550
Descartes develops a philosophy that reflects the newly developing sciences, like we just talked about, and in turn gives them legitimacy they otherwise lacked.

00:24:13.550 --> 00:24:30.816
A measure of his lasting influence is the fact that a significant part of philosophy since World War I has been devoted to showing that he was crucially wrong about some basic things which would not be worth doing unless his influence was still powerfully felt.

00:24:30.816 --> 00:24:35.772
So Descartes is our ancestor on that front.

00:24:35.772 --> 00:24:53.086
And then, finally, that the fact of he essentially creates epistemology, which is all about the study of knowledge, go into the book.

00:24:53.740 --> 00:25:03.804
In earlier philosophies there are many problems, the one in the many, the nature of reality explaining change, the soul, the existence of God.

00:25:03.804 --> 00:25:06.891
The problem of knowledge is just one among them.

00:25:06.891 --> 00:25:23.009
The Descartes' radical skepticism changes that After Descartes and until very recent times, most philosophers have thought that epistemological problems are absolutely foundational.

00:25:23.009 --> 00:25:31.824
Among these problems of knowledge, the problem about knowing the external world is the sharpest and the most dangerous?

00:25:31.824 --> 00:25:37.450
And we know anything at all beyond the contents of our minds?

00:25:37.450 --> 00:25:44.730
Unless this skeptical question can be satisfactorily answered, nothing else can be done.

00:25:44.730 --> 00:25:52.230
Epistemology is, for worse, the heart of philosophy for the next several hundred years.

00:25:52.230 --> 00:26:05.268
These are the problems that Descartes' successors will wrestle with, and that is why we should study Descartes.

00:26:09.099 --> 00:26:22.571
So in today's Mojo Minute, as we wrap up this Philosophy 101 class on Renee Descartes, just know that I think, therefore, am can be taken to an extreme.

00:26:22.571 --> 00:26:40.613
Thankfully, we can credit Descartes for teaching that athotic doubt, but that we cannot go too far down that rabbit hole, because skepticism is essentially a cul-de-sac.

00:26:40.613 --> 00:26:49.211
It offers no hope, and once we lose hope, that is against everything we know as a creature.

00:26:49.211 --> 00:26:55.029
Christian hope is in the fact that we do have a Creator who gives us hope.

00:26:55.029 --> 00:27:12.412
So, even though Descartes was a practicing Catholic, he missed some of his faith and not influencing his philosophy, but nevertheless important by far as a philosopher.

00:27:12.412 --> 00:27:17.222
That's why Peter Krief puts him in his Big Nine.

00:27:17.222 --> 00:27:20.951
We need to understand where that skepticism and that doubt comes from.

00:27:20.951 --> 00:27:25.848
But just know, I think, therefore, I AM can only go so far.

00:27:25.848 --> 00:27:40.780
So in today's Mojo Minute, that's one mind field that we can prevent ourselves from going towards or getting involved in, we can avoid those mind fields.

00:27:40.780 --> 00:27:44.103
So, as always, we can live a flourishing life.

MM#305--Philosophy 101--Descartes

Listen On

Featured Episodes

Recent Episodes

Support On