Oct. 15, 2025

MM#440--A House Dividing, Again, part 1: A Cold Civil War

FAN MAIL--We would love YOUR feedback--Send us a Text Message A nation does not tumble into crisis overnight; it drifts, argues, hardens—and then stumbles. We open the pages of David Potter’s A House Dividing to read the 1850s not as distant history but as a mirror for today’s tensions. From the Compromise of 1850 to the Fugitive Slave Act, Potter shows how moral shocks can force ordinary citizens into a confrontation with their own values. That’s the thread we follow into 2025: when people f...

FAN MAIL--We would love YOUR feedback--Send us a Text Message

A nation does not tumble into crisis overnight; it drifts, argues, hardens—and then stumbles. We open the pages of David Potter’s A House Dividing to read the 1850s not as distant history but as a mirror for today’s tensions. From the Compromise of 1850 to the Fugitive Slave Act, Potter shows how moral shocks can force ordinary citizens into a confrontation with their own values. That’s the thread we follow into 2025: when people feel conscripted into rules they reject, politics polarizes fast and rhetoric outruns prudence.

We walk through the essential parallels without forcing false equivalence. Sectionalism then was geographic; now it’s cultural, algorithmic, and mapped onto coasts and heartland. We examine federal flashpoints around immigration enforcement, debates over identity and sports, and the way governors, agencies, and local movements collide at the edge of the law. The question beneath the noise is Potter’s: how should a free people rank their values—freedom, union, morality, patriotism—when they pull in different directions? Most of us don’t want to sacrifice any of them, but refusing to choose is itself a choice that leaves events to choose for us.

Across the episode, we argue for two guardrails: hold the line on lawful order and refuse the language that turns neighbors into enemies. History warns that once rhetoric dehumanizes opponents, escalation can move faster than leaders can steer. We sketch the stakes, outline the risks of a “cold” conflict warming, and preview a series on how past “fire-eaters” used speech to accelerate crisis—and how we can avoid replaying that script.

If this conversation sharpened your thinking, share it with a friend, subscribe for the next part of the series, and leave a quick review so more thoughtful listeners can find us. Your voice helps keep the debate human—and the union strong.

Key Points from the Episode:

• why Potter’s A House Dividing still matters
• the Compromise of 1850 and the Fugitive Slave Act as moral shock
• parallels between 1850s fracture and 2025 cultural standoffs
• modern sectionalism on coasts vs heartland
• federal authority, state resistance, and flashpoints at ICE buildings
• ranking values: freedom, union, morality, patriotism
• immigration and identity as galvanizing issues
• cooling rhetoric while enforcing law
• preview of a series on rhetoric and escalation

Other resources:

MM#138--The Impending Crisis

Want to leave a review? Click here, and if we earned a five-star review from you **high five and knuckle bumps**, we appreciate it greatly!

00:00 - Opening And Core Question

00:35 - Why The Civil War Happened

01:13 - Potter’s Book And Why It Matters

02:40 - Parallels Between 1850s And Now

05:13 - Fugitive Slave Act And Moral Shock

08:37 - Modern Cultural Flashpoints

10:49 - Sectionalism Then And Now

13:30 - Federal Authority And Flashpoints

16:05 - Ranking Values: Freedom Vs Union

WEBVTT

00:00:07.280 --> 00:00:21.199
Welcome to the Theory to Action Podcast, where we examine the timeless treasures of wisdom from the great books and left time to help you take action immediately and ultimately to create and lead a flourishing life.

00:00:21.440 --> 00:00:25.199
Now, here's your host, David Kaiser.

00:00:26.719 --> 00:00:30.079
Hello, I name David, and welcome back to another Mojo Minute.

00:00:30.320 --> 00:00:34.000
As always, let's begin with the opening quote.

00:00:35.759 --> 00:00:45.439
The guns had scarcely cooled after Appomattox when historians began debating the causes of the American Civil War.

00:00:45.759 --> 00:00:48.799
Why had North and South grown apart?

00:00:49.119 --> 00:00:52.479
Had it all been about slavery as a moral question?

00:00:53.039 --> 00:00:56.799
Or were there less visible economic interest at work?

00:00:57.840 --> 00:01:04.799
Perhaps the cultures of the two sections had finally produced irreconcilable differences.

00:01:05.040 --> 00:01:13.439
The debates continue to this day with an occasional nugget of new information to spark revised interpretations.

00:01:13.840 --> 00:01:25.599
But nowhere is the reader likely to find a more brilliant and succinct analysis than in David Potter's account of the major events that led to war.

00:01:27.760 --> 00:01:35.680
And this quote comes to us from a great little book that I believe everyone, and I mean everyone, should read.

00:02:26.159 --> 00:02:28.639
Again, by the aforementioned Mr.

00:02:28.719 --> 00:02:29.840
David Potter.

00:02:30.319 --> 00:02:37.039
That book is some 22 hours on Audible, but it's one of the best books I've ever read about the lead up to the U.S.

00:02:37.120 --> 00:02:38.159
Civil War.

00:02:38.400 --> 00:02:40.080
And I highly recommend it.

00:02:40.319 --> 00:02:44.879
Now back to this short little book, A House Dividing.

00:02:46.000 --> 00:02:48.879
Why do we recommend that everyone read it?

00:02:49.599 --> 00:02:56.560
Because our house, our own house, in 2025 is dividing.

00:02:57.039 --> 00:02:58.879
It has been dividing.

00:02:59.280 --> 00:03:05.680
And none of us want the god-awful event of a second U.S.

00:03:05.840 --> 00:03:07.199
Civil War.

00:03:08.080 --> 00:03:12.639
Now I know many people will glamorize and say that it has come to this.

00:03:14.319 --> 00:03:16.319
But let's be really real.

00:03:17.360 --> 00:03:24.240
None of us, no one, and I mean no one, wants a civil war.

00:03:25.039 --> 00:03:38.240
We just watched the assassination of Charlie Kirk, an innocent man gunned down on a college campus for merely posing the questions about and around our cultural and national situation.

00:03:39.280 --> 00:03:43.680
And essentially just asking kids to prove me wrong.

00:03:44.159 --> 00:03:49.280
That was the name of his tour, prove me wrong tour.

00:03:50.719 --> 00:04:02.719
But in the proving wrong, we have some deranged lunatic that thinks that killing the innocent man would stop the country from asking and answering those questions.

00:04:04.319 --> 00:04:09.520
And why I say the house is dividing is because all of us can feel it.

00:04:10.960 --> 00:04:16.480
The attempted assassination of then candidate President Trump just a year and a half ago.

00:04:16.879 --> 00:04:38.160
The continued assaults on federal ICE officials by what can only be described as neo-Confederates rioting and preventing those agents trying to carry out their dutiful jobs, trying to carry out federal law and rounding up illegal immigrants.

00:04:38.800 --> 00:04:44.720
These neoconfedates are surrounding a federal building and assaulting those buildings.

00:04:45.920 --> 00:04:51.839
And this just doesn't happen on a random weekend in October.

00:04:52.160 --> 00:04:55.199
It's been happening for years.

00:04:55.600 --> 00:04:59.839
And it's just now coming to a head.

00:05:01.759 --> 00:05:04.399
So you can see if you have eyes to see.

00:05:04.959 --> 00:05:10.480
There are many parallels to the events leading up to the US Civil War between then and now.

00:05:11.199 --> 00:05:13.120
And what were those events?

00:05:13.439 --> 00:05:17.120
Well, let's take, for example, the compromise of 1850.

00:05:20.879 --> 00:05:24.160
Let's also talk about the Fugitive Slave Act.

00:05:25.120 --> 00:05:36.000
You know, the Comprise of 1850 was really trying to figure out how westward expansion would happen and how states would come into the Union.

00:05:36.399 --> 00:05:40.000
So there was the free state and the slave state debate.

00:05:42.480 --> 00:06:00.560
And then the Fugitive Slave Act, we know, that proved particularly inflammatory in the North because it forced previously uninvolved citizens to participate directly in the institution of slavery.

00:06:00.800 --> 00:06:15.759
The law denied fugitives the right to a jury trial and paid commissions, paid commissioners, ten dollars for the ruling in favor of slaveholders, but also five dollars for ruling in favor of alleged fugitives.

00:06:19.040 --> 00:06:30.959
Now that at the time was just blatant corruption, combined with the moral outrage of the forced participation in the god awful state of slavery.

00:06:31.519 --> 00:06:40.399
That drove many moderate northerners at the time throughout the whole eighteen fifties towards abolitionism.

00:06:42.160 --> 00:06:46.560
And you can see very close similarities.

00:06:49.439 --> 00:06:56.800
Today's day and age, we're forced to deal with men changing their genders and playing in women's sports.

00:06:58.160 --> 00:07:08.000
Parents are forced to have their girls participate in men that are changing their genders and playing in women's sports.

00:07:08.480 --> 00:07:25.279
So just like in the 1850s, many people came to believe in the North that you can't own another person, let alone force people then to obey some law and help retrieve fugitive slaves that are running toward freedom in the North.

00:07:25.839 --> 00:07:39.759
And yes, I know there was still racism in the North, but half the country was coming around to this issue of slavery, that you can't own another human being, period.

00:07:40.240 --> 00:07:41.439
Plain and simple.

00:07:41.680 --> 00:07:43.600
Just a fundamental fact.

00:07:46.240 --> 00:07:52.240
You know, Harriet Beecher Stowe's book, Uncle Tom's Cabin came out in I think 1852.

00:07:52.319 --> 00:07:54.240
It galvanized the nation.

00:07:54.800 --> 00:08:02.720
I think there were some 200,000 or 300,000 books bought, which at the time was unthinkable.

00:08:03.279 --> 00:08:08.000
It described the horrors and the details of chattel slavery.

00:08:08.319 --> 00:08:11.360
And it provoked a firestorm in both the North and the South.

00:08:11.439 --> 00:08:20.639
Many believe that it started to galvanize and push public opinion one way or another, all about slavery.

00:08:23.439 --> 00:08:33.679
So much so that even President Lincoln was said when he met Harriet Beecher Stowe during the war, I think 1862, 1863.

00:08:34.320 --> 00:08:38.399
He was quoted as saying, So this is the little lady who started this great war.

00:08:39.600 --> 00:08:41.679
Now back to our current time period.

00:08:41.919 --> 00:08:56.480
Reasonable people looking around at our culture and saying men can't be women and men can't play in women's sports, plain and simple, is now causing controversy.

00:08:57.200 --> 00:09:02.159
And there's a major political party that are saying you're wrong.

00:09:03.039 --> 00:09:06.399
And we're not going to accept this.

00:09:08.000 --> 00:09:16.080
And you have another major political party that is saying we're wrong, that men can become women and can play in women's sports.

00:09:16.320 --> 00:09:19.759
And by the way, you will accept this.

00:09:29.679 --> 00:09:37.200
Now, a second parallel to our times in the 1850s is the extreme sectionalism.

00:09:53.279 --> 00:09:56.799
Meaning campaigning was different, certainly different back then.

00:09:56.960 --> 00:10:00.000
You had representatives who did the campaigning for you.

00:10:00.240 --> 00:10:06.960
And you would have people in various parts of the country that represented you as a candidate in that locality.

00:10:07.600 --> 00:10:16.399
Well, Lincoln didn't have very many representatives that wanted to venture into the South or war were from the South.

00:10:17.519 --> 00:10:28.559
Even some said because the violence that would be heaped upon them, they felt that they weren't even safe to utter Lincoln's name in the South, in the least bit.

00:10:29.840 --> 00:10:30.879
So what about today?

00:10:31.039 --> 00:10:34.399
Do we have extreme sectionalism in our country today?

00:10:35.519 --> 00:10:38.000
We do, but it's different.

00:10:38.240 --> 00:10:48.399
Both the left coast and the right coast, the west coast and the east coast, vote blue in large majorities.

00:10:48.720 --> 00:10:51.200
Some areas are deep, deep blue.

00:10:51.440 --> 00:10:54.960
It's been that trend since the late 1990s.

00:10:55.440 --> 00:11:03.279
And in the middle of the country, it's going red, deep red, with pockets of deep blue in these major U.S.

00:11:03.519 --> 00:11:04.399
cities.

00:11:05.279 --> 00:11:12.159
And lo and behold, where are the major flashpoints we are seeing as we look around our country in 2025?

00:11:12.879 --> 00:11:14.879
Well, the flashpoints are around the U.S.

00:11:14.960 --> 00:11:19.919
federal buildings, especially the immigration and customs enforcement buildings.

00:11:20.240 --> 00:11:22.879
Portland and Chicago, to be specific.

00:11:23.440 --> 00:11:28.320
There we are finding an extreme tense standoffs and shootings.

00:11:28.559 --> 00:11:31.759
Violence is erupting around these federal installations.

00:11:32.000 --> 00:11:35.679
We have the shooting at the Dallas Ice Building.

00:11:36.559 --> 00:11:40.879
Does all this parallel Fort Sumter 1861?

00:11:41.600 --> 00:11:46.879
Are the governors in these states of Oregon and Illinois helping the federal agents?

00:11:47.200 --> 00:11:47.519
No.

00:11:48.639 --> 00:11:49.279
Why?

00:11:50.399 --> 00:11:54.559
Because President Trump wants to enforce federal law and deport the illegals.

00:11:56.639 --> 00:12:04.080
So then the question becomes: are these governors acting like South Carolina and the lower South states in the run up to the U.S.

00:12:04.159 --> 00:12:04.799
Civil War?

00:12:04.960 --> 00:12:07.600
Are they the neo-Confederates of today?

00:12:08.720 --> 00:12:21.440
Have to realize that federal law is going to trump state laws, especially and specifically with keeping order and wanting no violence at these federal buildings.

00:12:22.399 --> 00:12:24.799
This is not going to end well for these governors.

00:12:24.960 --> 00:12:27.600
They should read our history.

00:12:28.320 --> 00:12:32.960
And the rhetoric, oh, the rhetoric is over the top from these officials.

00:12:33.600 --> 00:12:39.679
Now they will blame Trump, and Trump will blame them.

00:12:40.000 --> 00:12:43.759
But regardless, the rhetoric is over the top from elected officials.

00:12:43.919 --> 00:12:51.840
And here's where I think David Potter's short little book can help all of us in view of where all this is going.

00:12:52.399 --> 00:12:55.600
Let's go back to the book for this most important quote.

00:12:57.200 --> 00:13:08.639
The question for them, northern states, was not a choice of alternatives, antislavery or pro slavery, but a ranking of values.

00:13:08.960 --> 00:13:11.039
This is a super important point.

00:13:12.000 --> 00:13:16.879
How far ought the harmony of the Union to be sacrificed to the principle of freedom?

00:13:17.120 --> 00:13:24.000
How far ought their feeling against slavery to be restrained by their veneration for the Union?

00:13:24.480 --> 00:13:28.720
How much should morality yield to patriotism or vice versa?

00:13:29.200 --> 00:13:46.240
The difference between antislavery men and conciliate conciliationist in the North was not a question of what they thought about slavery alone, but of how they ranked these priorities.

00:13:46.879 --> 00:13:58.240
A few took the position that the Union was not worth saving unless it embodied the principle of freedom and thus they gave the slavery issue a clear priority.

00:13:58.399 --> 00:13:59.759
They agreed with John P.

00:13:59.919 --> 00:14:10.000
Hale of New Hampshire when he declared if this union with all of its advantages has no other cement than the blood of human slavery, let it perish.

00:14:10.639 --> 00:14:21.279
A few others took the clear cut view that the Union was infinitely more important than the slavery issue and must not be jeopardized by it.

00:14:21.759 --> 00:14:46.639
Like John Chipman of Michigan, where he was said when gentlemen pretending to love their country would place the consideration of the nominal liberation of a handful of degraded Africans in one scale and the Union in the other, and make the latter kick the beam, he would not have a he would not give a fig for their patriotism.

00:14:48.320 --> 00:14:55.360
But most people were profoundly unwilling to sacrifice one value to the other.

00:14:57.440 --> 00:15:05.759
So you can see that same question not posed to us as the simple are you pro-slavery or anti-slavery just before the U.S.

00:15:05.840 --> 00:15:14.240
Civil War, but of the values of 60 to 70 to 80 percent of most reasonable Americans.

00:15:15.120 --> 00:15:22.879
Now most reasonable Americans view that men can't become women and men should not be playing in women's sports, plain and simple.

00:15:24.080 --> 00:15:38.080
And I'm not making that argument that slave the slavery question, I'm not making the argument that the gender question is the slavery question of our current day.

00:15:39.279 --> 00:15:48.559
But you can see where the illegal immigration question is starting to become the slavery question of our day.

00:15:48.879 --> 00:15:52.639
One side says illegal immigrants are here and have been here.

00:15:52.879 --> 00:16:00.720
It's their right and they are entitled to becoming citizens because they got here physically, plain and simple.

00:16:01.679 --> 00:16:04.960
The other side says that is incredibly wrong.

00:16:05.120 --> 00:16:07.120
They broke the law to get here.

00:16:07.759 --> 00:16:20.399
And we have a vast and very liberal immigration system and series of laws that allow people to come to our country legally to do it the right way.

00:16:21.600 --> 00:16:31.679
And again, you can see the illegal immigration question is galvanizing both sides to go to their separate corners.

00:16:32.080 --> 00:16:37.519
And that, my friends, is a scary, scary situation.

00:16:40.159 --> 00:16:51.840
Now, one question we should ask and answer is are the current radical Democrats rightly called now Neo-Confederates?

00:16:52.720 --> 00:16:56.639
And are we in a cold civil war right now?

00:16:58.080 --> 00:17:01.200
To those questions I say yes and yes.

00:17:02.159 --> 00:17:07.200
So in today's mojo minute, let us not dismiss these vital questions.

00:17:07.839 --> 00:17:12.079
Let us pray about them and consider a pathway forward.

00:17:14.079 --> 00:17:28.480
Violence is never the answer, but breaking the law repeatedly and then violence against the people trying to enforce that law is a recipe to start the eighteen sixties all over again.

00:17:28.880 --> 00:17:30.480
None of us want that.

00:17:32.799 --> 00:17:37.839
Now, this is going to be part of what I think is going to become a three to four part series.

00:17:39.680 --> 00:17:46.240
Because the rhetoric question is where the breakdown begins to happen.

00:17:46.799 --> 00:17:53.440
And once it begins to happen, it usually happens fast, just like it did with the U.S.

00:17:53.599 --> 00:17:54.720
Civil War.

00:17:55.119 --> 00:17:59.119
In our next episode, we're going to talk all about the fire eaters of the South.

00:17:59.279 --> 00:18:00.400
Who were they?

00:18:00.799 --> 00:18:02.640
How radical were they?

00:18:03.119 --> 00:18:08.720
And how do they compare to our current radicals in speech and violence?

00:18:09.039 --> 00:18:17.279
Until then, keep fighting the good fight and pray for a pathway forward where the respect of federal law is followed.

00:18:17.680 --> 00:18:19.200
Thank you for joining us.

00:18:19.359 --> 00:18:22.480
We hope you enjoyed this Theory to Action podcast.

00:18:22.640 --> 00:18:31.759
Be sure to check out our show page at TeamMojoAcademy.com, where we have everything we discussed in this podcast, as well as other great resources.

00:18:32.079 --> 00:18:33.200
Until next time,