California's Own Elections Prove the System is Broken
Earlier this week, I introduced Seth Keshel’s Eight Cardinal Sins of election administration and showed you how California checks nearly every box.
Before I give you Keshel’s own words, I want to show you something hiding in plain sight — California’s own recent elections. Because you don’t need a conspiracy theory when the publicly reported numbers tell the story themselves.
The Governor’s Primary
In California’s most recent gubernatorial primary, in-person turnout was anemic. The race that will determine the leadership of the largest state in the country — a state with nearly 40 million people and 22 million registered voters — was decided by a relative handful of engaged voters showing up in person.
Mail-in ballots didn’t supplement that turnout. They *dwarfed* it.
The majority of votes cast were mail-in — collected over weeks, harvested by third-party operatives, submitted through a chain of custody that no independent observer can fully verify. The candidates who won weren’t necessarily the ones who built the most enthusiasm. They were the ones whose organizations were best at finding outstanding ballots and getting them submitted.
That’s not an election. That’s a logistics operation.
The LA Mayor’s Race
Look at the Los Angeles mayoral race and the numbers get worse. LA is the second largest city in America. Its mayor governs more people than most US states. And yet the raw vote totals in that race — again dominated by mail-in ballots — represented a fraction of the city’s registered voters.
When you strip away the mail-in volume, the in-person enthusiasm simply wasn’t there to match the reported totals. That gap — between the organic energy of a race and the industrial volume of its mail-in ballot return — is exactly what Keshel’s Cardinal Sins framework is designed to identify.
No ID was required to originate any of those ballots. No meaningful restriction existed on who could collect them. And the counting window stretched days beyond Election Day — giving the system time to find every last outstanding ballot before the result was certified.
This is what Jim Crow 2.0 looks like in practice.
Not a burning cross. Not a poll tax. A spreadsheet, a van, and a 7-day window to create the machine.
Don’t believe me? Here is Victor Davis Hanson—a long time CA resident—even he doesnt believe the CA corrupt elections.
Or if you prefer, others who have seen this same movie play out over and over again.
We now have a new name “legal fraud” being put out in advance to further advance the narrative
Check out this out
Now here are Keshel’s own words—telling us about this “legal fraud” and exactly how this machine was built — and why it’s almost impossible to dismantle from the inside.
***
