Dr. Fauci's Diary Actually Shows...
On Thursday, I told you Fauci refused to answer questions about his own diary. If you missed that article, check it out here
Today, let’s look at what’s actually in it.
The diary itself
Here’s the short version of what Paul says the diary shows.
this video is an excellent quick 8 minute breakdown showing the actual diary writings.
Pay attention to the first 4 minutes most especially
PS keep watching the video to hear about the Russian Flu in 1977. excellent point.
In public as demonstrated in the video, Fauci said the idea that COVID leaked from a lab in China was a fringe theory but came from a wet market over and over again. Something only conspiracy theorists believed. He said it with confidence, like there was no real debate.
But in his own private notes, he wrote something different. He said he kept an open mind about a lab leak, even while he personally leaned toward believing the virus came from nature. He even wrote that just because two things are both possible doesn’t mean they’re equally likely.
So picture this: in public, he sounds sure. In private, he sounds unsure.
That’s not necessarily lying. Doctors and scientists often simplify things for the public. That’s normal. But there’s a difference between:
Simplifying something you believe, and
Saying something totally different than what you privately think.
That gap — between what he said and what he wrote — is the heart of this whole story.
And it’s not just one diary entry. Outside of the diary, there are many, many emails going back and forth between Fauci and other scientists and officials, and the same pattern shows up again and again. In private, Fauci and the people around him raise doubts, ask hard questions, and admit what they don’t know. In public, that uncertainty disappears, and Fauci speaks with total confidence. Once or twice, that could be a coincidence. Over and over, across years of emails, it starts to look like a pattern. And that is the concerning part.
Put yourself in the Senators shoes, you are tasked with getting to the truth of what happened and you have a diary from one of the leading experts who made many many decisions throughout the COVID19 time period and now he won’t answer questions? why not?
Now here’s what’s coming up.
You’re about to go book by book through the three cases being made against Fauci — starting with the White House insider who says he was frozen out for raising the alarm, then the senator who says the diary proves a cover-up, then the author who says Fauci became a symbol of something much bigger than himself. And by the end, you’ll see the one big idea connecting all three — an idea that matters a lot more than just this one story.
