MM#488--The Five Year Anniversary of Abbey Gate And The Cost Of Hesitation
FAN MAIL--We would love YOUR feedback--Send us a Text Message A single moment at Abbey Gate still captures a whole era of American foreign policy: a Marine identifies a threat, asks for permission to act, and is told no until the danger disappears into the crowd. Hours later, the Kabul evacuation turns into a massacre that kills 13 American service members and scores of Afghan civilians. Five years on, we slow down and tell the story with the weight it deserves, because remembrance means more...
FAN MAIL--We would love YOUR feedback--Send us a Text Message
A single moment at Abbey Gate still captures a whole era of American foreign policy: a Marine identifies a threat, asks for permission to act, and is told no until the danger disappears into the crowd. Hours later, the Kabul evacuation turns into a massacre that kills 13 American service members and scores of Afghan civilians. Five years on, we slow down and tell the story with the weight it deserves, because remembrance means more than silence. It means asking what decisions were made, who owned them, and why accountability never showed up afterward.
From there, we zoom out and connect three books that frame the problem in plain terms. We use Michael Mandelbaum’s “The Four Ages of American Foreign Policy” to explain how the United States became a hyperpower and still stumbled through repeated setbacks. We pull in Serhii Plokhy’s writing on the Russo-Ukrainian War to underline a pattern: ambiguity is an invitation, and hesitation is never neutral. When the free world hedges, predators don’t wait politely. We tie those ideas back to Kabul, where America had the tools to secure the evacuation but lacked the competent, decisive leadership to use them.
Then we face the present. Afghanistan under the Taliban is a closed emirate, and the crisis for women and girls is among the worst on the planet. We also dig into Iran and the administration’s next move: “Economic D-Day,” a strategy built around aggressive secondary sanctions and maritime pressure designed to squeeze Iran’s cash without launching another shooting war. The big question is enforcement, especially when most Iranian oil reportedly flows to China and the world watches whether Washington has the stomach to follow through.
Key Points from the Episode:
• Recounting the Abbey Gate timeline and the denied requests to engage a suspected bomber
• Arguing that these deaths are not inevitable but tied to incompetent, unaccountable decisions
• Explaining the “hyperpower without success” idea and why strength fails without will
• Linking Afghanistan, Georgia, and Ukraine through the lesson that ambiguity invites aggression
• Asking what Afghanistan looks like under Taliban rule and what happened to women and girls
• Debating why the US stayed after 2011 and what “finishing the job” would have required
• Assessing Iran pressure after regional strikes and the way allies hedge when costs rise
• Breaking down “Economic D-Day,” secondary sanctions, maritime blockade concepts, and the China enforcement problem
If this episode helped you to see the story more clearly, I'd be grateful if you left a review. Click the link if we've earned five stars from you.
Other goodness
LM#37---American Foreign Policy, part 3
Check us out over at substack! We are building and have built out a whole library of book briefs, just one pager's five-minute read over at the Mojo Book Academy on Substack, mojoacademy.substack.com.
Keep fighting the good fight!
00:00 - Welcome And Mojo Minute Setup
01:22 - Abbey Gate And A Preventable Attack
05:34 - Hyperpower Theory And Hard Lessons
08:49 - Afghanistan Aftermath And Why We Stayed
11:13 - Iran Strikes And Allies Hedging
12:49 - Economic D-Day And The Sanctions Plan
15:18 - China, Enforcement, Names, And Closing
Welcome And Mojo Minute Setup
SPEAKER_00Welcome to the Theory to Action Podcast, where we examine the timeless treasures of wisdom from the great books in less time to help you take action immediately and ultimately to create and lead a flourishing life. Now, here's your host, David Kaiser.
SPEAKER_01Hello, this is David, and welcome back to another Mojo Minute.
Abbey Gate And A Preventable Attack
SPEAKER_01Five years ago. Today, five years since 13 American service members died at a gate in Kabul, holding the line, the awful line, that their own government had already given up on. That's the story we're going to tell today. August 26th marks five years since 13 members, 13 American service members died at Abbey Gate. That deserves more than a moment of silence. It deserves a whole story. So today we're going to revisit American foreign policy trilogy that we did a while back, but we're going to go backwards. We're going to start at the gate. Back then, in our previous foreign policy trilogy, we covered a book called Kabul by Jerry Dunleavy and James Hassan. Dunleavy is an investigative reporter for the Washington Examiner, and Hassan is a former Army captain who had served in Afghanistan himself. These men, these are men who went and got sworn statements. August 26, 2021, at Abbey Gate and Kabul, American Marines spotted a man matching the exact description of a known suicide bomber. He had a shaved head, close cropped beard, all black. He was wearing all black. Had a backpack with three yellow arrows. Sergeant Tyler Vargas Andrews requested permission to engage. Permission was denied three times. Not once. Three times. The man disappeared into the crowd. Hours later he detonated his vest. Thirteen American service members died. So did at least 170 Afghan civilians, including an eight-year-old son of an American interpreter who had served this country for over a decade in country. Horrific. Agonizing. Tragedy. There's no other words to describe it. The book Kabul. The authors are direct. It's a great book. I urge you to read it. I'll be direct too. These deaths were not inevitable. They were the product of the author's own words of ignorance and self-assurance. Bagram Air Force Base was abandoned before the evacuation was secure. Airport security was handed unbelievably to the Taliban, and the very prison holding the eventual bomber was thrown open in the chaos. So let that sink in. We armed the jailbreak that freed the man who killed our own Marines. Then President Joe Biden never once said the 13 names in public. Not one official resigned. Anthony Blinken did not come to the hill. He was held in contempt. Still nothing happened. A gold star mother stood in front of President Biden hoping for a word of sorrow. Said in her own words she found him an empty and soulless person. May God have mercy on his soul, and may he find the grace to repent. So our nugget for Abbey Gate today is power without competent, accountable leadership is just potential sitting on a shelf. You see, we're a hyperpower and we had every tool we needed to protect those 13 kids at the gate. And we didn't use them.
Hyperpower Theory And Hard Lessons
SPEAKER_01Now to understand how we got that much power and how we squandered the will to use it, we got to go back to the other two books we featured. Book two is The Four Ages of American Foreign Policy by Michael Maundenbaum. He traces America from a genuinely weak power at its founding to the mightiest hyperpower the world has ever seen since World War II. And that nugget of wisdom is hyperpower status never translated into hyperpower success. You see, from 1990 to 2015, we had setback after setback. September 11th, Afghanistan, Iraq, we all remember it. Because some of our leadership wanted to spread democracy around the world. But did you catch that? Abbey Gate isn't an accident inside Maundenbaum's story. It's the conclusion, 20 years of hyperpower, and we still walked out the back door in chaos. Thankfully, we're not there. And we don't have boots on the ground in Iran. And then book three of our feature trilogy back then in 2023 was The Russo-Ukrainian War by Sergei Polki. Polki is a Ukrainian-born Harvard historian who lost a cousin in the war and still wrote a fairly good account of the war up to that point. His argument was that in Ukraine there's nothing new. It's an old imperial war dressed up in modern garb. You see, in 2008, France and Germany blocked Ukraine and Georgia from NATO membership, and they promised a lot of things and they delivered nothing. And then weeks later, Russia invaded Georgia to test the world resolve, to test NATO's resolve. And Polky's nugget is ambiguity is an invitation itself. When the free world hedges, when the world's hyperpower hedges, the predator doesn't wait politely at the door. He walks in. And that's the same lesson Kabul teaches us, just wearing a different uniform. You hedge in Georgia, Russia walks in. You hedge in Bagram, the Taliban walks in. Different continent, same indecision. And here's the whole trilogy in one sentence: the nugget beneath the nugget, if you will. A nation can rise from a weak power to a hyperpower and still lose a war at her own front gate because hesitation is never neutral. The world's always watching the hyperpower. Somebody else always fills the space we refuse to hold. Doesn't mean we have to hold everywhere. Now that's the past.
Afghanistan Aftermath And Why We Stayed
SPEAKER_01And today we have a harder question. Did we learn anything from it? Let's ask about Afghanistan. Today the Taliban runs the country as a closed, unaccountable Islamic emirate. No elections, no free press, but what happened to Afghan women and girls goes beyond anything most Americans realize. Over 100 decrees stripping women's rights since 2021. One 2026 accounting puts the number at 166. Roughly 2.4 million girls are barred from secondary school and from university. Just this year, new roles make it harder for women to seek divorce and legal protection. And over 10 million women and girls need humanitarian aid to survive in the country. The inept United Nations calls it the most severe women's rights crisis on the planet. It's not just a regional embarrassment, it's the worst in the world. And we know the United Nations is incompetent to even broach the topic, which is a different podcast for a different day. Why did we stay in Afghanistan after we got bin Laden in 2011? It's a fair question. We stayed to keep the Taliban from retaking the country, to hunt other Al Qaeda leaders from Afghan soil, and it frankly worked. We got al-Qaeda's next leader in Kabul in 2022. And to try, however, imperfectly, to hand the country to the Afghan government that could stand on its own. But that connects right back to our first book in Mandambaum. A hyperpower had the strength to topple the Taliban in weeks, but she never found the will across four presidents to finish the job and leave clean. It's not a strategy, it's a nation stuck between two decisions, and Abbey Gate is where the indecision came due.
Iran Strikes And Allies Hedging
SPEAKER_01And now we come to the elephant in the room, Iran. Back in February, the United States and Israel struck Iran directly, an operation called Operation Epic Fury. Did the region rally behind us the way you would expect after weakening a horrific, dangerous nuclear threat? Not really. Not sure if it was Israeli. Israeli intelligence that said it would. Certainly Israel stood with us clearly without hesitation. Iran struck back at American diplomatic, military, and energy targets across the region. Oman said plainly it was disappointed diplomacy got abandoned. Russia condemned the strike as destabilizing. Even Spain, a now a NATO ally, but now far, far left wing, reportedly refused to let us use her air bases. So a NATO ally said no. That's the behavior of nations hedging their bets, wanting to Iran, waiting on Iran to be weakened, but wanting no part of the blowback. Now, fourth, what's happening just this week as we celebrate the fifth anniversary of Abbey Gate and the 13 Americans who died there. This week, thankfully, the administration has announced the next phase of Iran pressure.
Economic D-Day And The Sanctions Plan
SPEAKER_01It's got a name straight out of the history books. Economic D-Day is what Scott Bessant is calling it. Here's the plan. Instead of more bombs, Washington wants to squeeze the money. A maritime blockade of Iranian shipping paired with the toughest secondary sanctions ever tried against every third country, bank, shipper, buyer, keeping Tehran's economy alive. The goal, force Iran back to the table, force open the Strait of Hormuz without another military or without another major military campaign. So who is getting squeezed in this? Any refiner trading firm still buying Iranian crude? Any bank or exchange house still moving with Iranian money? Any tank or rather any tanker or ship that is registered as helping Iranian oil slip through the shadows. And here's the nugget for today that connects every one of these books. Treasury Secretary Scott Besson said the point is to make economic pressure decisive enough that we never need another shooting war. That's Mandenbaum's argument playing out in real time. A hyperpower finally trying every tool short of the battlefield instead of overreaching or retreating. Here's the however. Roughly 80 to 90% of Iran's oil still flows to one buyer, China. Washington hasn't said whether it will sanction Beijing's own banks and biggest firms. President Z, the Premier of China, will come and sit down with President Trump on the White House lawn September 24th. And boy, that meeting is big. And may decide this campaign more than any sanctions list ever could. Iran has dodged sanctions before with discounted oil and many shadow fleets. And she's certainly going to try and dodge this one too. So here's the real and much fuller nugget.
China, Enforcement, Names, And Closing
SPEAKER_01It's bringing us back to today's anniversary. A hyperpower who let indecision, once led indecision, cost 13 sons and daughters at a gate, and Kabul is now five years later trying something different, squeezing the enemy's wallet deeply, powerfully, instead of just her territory. Maundenbaum gave us the theory, Polky gave us the pattern, Kabul gave us the tragedy, and economic D-Day is America's newest attempt to finally get it right. Whether it works, tough call. Depends less on the announcement and more on whether Washington has the stomach to enforce it effectively, especially against China herself. And whether Iran would rather bend than break. Now that's not a comfortable ending, but it's an honest one and it's a real one. So in today's mojo minute, say their names of the 13 Americans who held the gate that their own government had already let go of. That's the debt that we owe them today. It's the debt that this anniversary asks of you and me to pay every single year for incompetent leadership. Now, if this episode helped you to see the story more clearly, I'd be grateful if you left a review. Click the link if we've earned five stars from you. Little high five and knuckle bumps for that. Thank you. You'll help more people to find this show. But until next time, pray for the families of the 13. And as always, keep fighting the good fight.
SPEAKER_00Thank you for joining us. We hope you enjoyed this theory to action podcast. Be sure to check out our show page at TeamMojoAcademy.com, where we have everything we discussed in this podcast as well as other great resources. Until next time, you mojo.
